Need Opinions

[skipp]

Just curious, which would you rather do.

#1
TestP 525mg/wk
NPP 525mg/wk
for 80 Days

*or*

#2
TestP 700mg/wk
NPP 700mg/wk
for 60 Days

[Bigmax]

#2 bro...

[givenchy]

number 2

[S431M7]

is this a rhetorical question, number 2 anyway.

[kfrost06]

If it was test e and deca, I would say number 1 but test p and NPP definitely number 2.

[GHO5T]

Both are almost identical bro,

Prop is Test with a shorter ester, NPP is deca with a shorter ester.

Not sure what you mean by your post?

~GHO5T~

[GHO5T]

What are your goals with the proposed cycle(s) bro?

IMO if you can reach your goals with the shorter duration cycle (#1) i would run that, however if you know you will need more time to reach your goals, then run number 2.

~GHO5T~

[skipp]

My diet and training will be on point either way, the question is whether you think I can gain more on which one. Because is essence, it's the exact same total mg's, just different freq.

#2 Looks like a forsure winner with the crowd, thanks fellas.

[taiboxa]

i would run prop at 50mg ED and NPP @ 100mg ED

[kfrost06]

Both are almost identical bro,

Prop is Test with a shorter ester, NPP is deca with a shorter ester.

Not sure what you mean by your post?

~GHO5T~

I meant, because it's a shorter ester the 60 day cycle is better, if it was the longer ester(deca and cyp) it would take longer to kick in and the longer cycle at lower dose would be better.

[skipp]

i would run prop at 50mg ED and NPP @ 100mg ED

Already brewed it in a 1:1 ratio, that's why there's only 1:1 options.. I was gonna brew 75:100 but I decided agaisnt it as I respond to test pretty well.