i wanna do 6 weeks of dbols and run prop for 6 weeks at 300mg a week, think this is ok .
i wanna do 6 weeks of dbols and run prop for 6 weeks at 300mg a week, think this is ok .
pointless, the likelyness of you keeping even 5 lbs is rough...if you plan on doing a cycle, 'plan' it out, and do it right...6 weeks is not enough...regardless of your using short acting aas or not...jmho
I gotta agree- it will be a fun 6 weeks, long term gains won't be very impressive.
so what do u guys suggest?
Stats
research.
no less than 10 weeks imo
no more D-Bol than what is needed to "kick start" your test
maybe test en instead?? first cycle??
I disagree....6 weeks on prop is prolly long enough...its fast acting...
Gains from prop do tend to even out around the 6-8 week mark...
I bet youd see great gains with a 6 week cycle of dbol and prop...
interesting...what do you know i learn something everyday!!
So do I bro. Don't worry, this is process that never stopsOriginally posted by symatech
interesting...what do you know i learn something everyday!!![]()
right on pete...Im all about the knowledge I gain daily...
p.s. i love your sig.
im a simpsons fan (like you couldnt tell)
saying he is going to keep gains from prop rather than any other test i.e. - enant or cyp, or sust, or omna, or sten, or suspension, or whatever is kidna silly, test is test, regardless of what test he takes the gains are going to 'go or stay' in the same mannor in regards to; cycle length, potency, ancillaries, post cycle therapy, and the person themself...thats like saying take a buncha test (dbol, prop) kill your bodies hpta, and then keep it all after? skeptical
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)