Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: how does body weight affect the mg's needed to grow?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    The South West
    Posts
    3,393

    how does body weight affect the mg's needed to grow?

    Does a person who is say 300 lbs need to take more mgs of gear vs someone who is 200lbs? Or does weight not play a roll in how much to take?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    The South West
    Posts
    3,393
    bump

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Standing Above Weakness
    Posts
    16,033
    I think it may depend on how much of that weight is lean muscle mass vs. bf%. Bump for a more defined answer....

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    GTA, Canada
    Posts
    6,121
    Quote Originally Posted by Igifuno
    I think it may depend on how much of that weight is lean muscle mass vs. bf%. Bump for a more defined answer....
    Also depends on cycle history. Fresh virgin receptors will require far less mgs of steroids than someone who has lets say 5 cycles under their belt and their receptors have been used quite a bit.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    The South West
    Posts
    3,393
    yeah lets say that everything is the same years training, years cycling, ect, but one guy is 5'8" and 200lbs, and the other 6'5" 300lbs.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    IN your walls
    Posts
    574
    the more gear the more you will grow!!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    993
    Quote Originally Posted by crazyhorse666
    the more gear the more you will grow!!
    so u believe if a person had never done a cycle and he did 500mg of test week for 12 weeks would grow alot more than if he did 300mg a week for 12 weeks. this is just a question im not say i disagree

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    34,255
    Quote Originally Posted by rabidsquirrel
    so u believe if a person had never done a cycle and he did 500mg of test week for 12 weeks would grow alot more than if he did 300mg a week for 12 weeks. this is just a question im not say i disagree
    500mg probably much better than 300mg but 1000mg not nessicarily any better than 500, depends on the person. Use the least amount of gear that is giving you good gains. I have been here just long enough to see crazyhorse planning on chauking up a year long cycle at cycle high dosages so imo crazyhorse is crazy.
    Last edited by Kratos; 07-07-2007 at 12:18 AM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,446
    I always wondered about this. Generally speaking, I would have to say yes, that more weight = need for more gear. But, That would be dependant on the gear. I think test, would be about the same for all. But other compounds I would have to venture to guess they SHOULD be dosed by mg/kg, like all other meds, but I have never ready anything to confirm that.

    Anyone have any solid information rather than speculation?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    South JerseyJ
    Posts
    1,223
    Quote Originally Posted by buffgator
    Does a person who is say 300 lbs need to take more mgs of gear vs someone who is 200lbs? Or does weight not play a roll in how much to take?
    Diet will play a bigger roll on your cycle.
    Fiirst cycle 500 test a week 250 Monday 250 Thursday

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    993
    i think for a first cycle 300mg a week is plenty for anyones first cycle. i know alot of people on this site say 500mg but me and all my buddys did 250-300mg for first cycles. we all gained at least 20 pounds. they where only 6-7 week cycle, i do beleive it should be run at least 12 week.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    177
    I did 700mg a week of prop on my first cycle. and gained about 20lbs in 8weeks that I kept.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    993
    i only kept 16-17 of it but i did much less test. i just dont think 450 more mg of test a week is worth 3 pounds.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,446
    Quote Originally Posted by rabidsquirrel
    i only kept 16-17 of it but i did much less test. i just dont think 450 more mg of test a week is worth 3 pounds.
    I think there is a good lesson to be learned there. Once you start pushing the dosage envelope, you start to decrease keepable gains. If you don't want to subject your body to the life of a "always on or bridging" life of a pro, moderate doses are the key.

    I think too often guys will run higher doses of gear, get great gains, lose most of it and play hell on their bodies for nothing.

    Granted there is receptor issues that makes them require more of a compound. But still, too often I don't think people thiunk things through. AAS will push you past that genetic ability, but in the end, mother nature will win. Long term you will only keep what your body can support.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    lol im not telling :D
    Posts
    29,198
    the more LBM u have, the more of everything u need

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    IN your walls
    Posts
    574
    Quote Originally Posted by Kratos
    500mg probably much better than 300mg but 1000mg not nessicarily any better than 500, depends on the person. Use the least amount of gear that is giving you good gains. I have been here just long enough to see crazyhorse planning on chauking up a year long cycle at cycle high dosages so imo crazyhorse is crazy.
    HA ha thanks Kratos. I on the other had do belive the more you take the bigger you will get,BUT there is a point. How much nitro can you run in a stock motor?!. you got to build yourself up to be able to handle more power!!

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    blighty
    Posts
    1,436
    Quote Originally Posted by buffgator
    Does a person who is say 300 lbs need to take more mgs of gear vs someone who is 200lbs? Or does weight not play a roll in how much to take?
    good question,ive seen it asked before but not answered definately,as tai says one would assume the more lbm the more of everything but id like to see it demonstrated on some identical twins to know for sure

    any twin members up for it?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •