Results 1 to 15 of 15
Thread: Bad Drug Testing
-
10-10-2007, 06:22 PM #1New Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 13
Bad Drug Testing
I just recieved a positive drug test for nandrolone metabolite the consintration was 14ng/mL. the funny thing is i wasnt on that and havent been for over a year and a half. how is this possible and how high is that consintration?
-
I beleive deca metabolites can be detected for up to 18 months.. ( not postive on that )..
Merc.
-
10-10-2007, 06:35 PM #3
18 months is correct.
-
10-10-2007, 06:37 PM #4
wow what were you tested for??
-
10-10-2007, 06:42 PM #5New Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 13
I set a state record in bench press and got a %of 2.99xbwt.so they tested me or did you mean what substances
-
10-10-2007, 06:53 PM #6New Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 13
just checked my journal it will be two years off nov. 23 so its been more than 18 months i read at jornals.jmb.com that your body can produce a substance that will cause a false possitive. the onlt other thing i can think of is my current supplement stack
MAx Gen-x(bovine colostrum 1000mg)
Max Testobol-x(Trib stack 1710mg.)
*Tren xtreme(19-noradrosta 4,9 diene 3,17 dione 30mg)
*TT-40 (androsta-1-3B-ol-one 70mg)
* started them a week ago,tested 4 weeks ago
-
10-10-2007, 07:06 PM #7
This is why I will never ever be using Nandrolone Decanoate. That shit stays in your system for well over a year and a half. This may explain the erectile dysfunction problems some bodybuilders are complaining about WAY after they finish their deca cycles. Most books/websites/forums/profiles state Deca has a detection time of 18 months. With a detection time of that long, I wouldn't be surprised if that stuff is in your system for way longer than that, even.
Sorry, deca aint for me.
-
10-10-2007, 07:45 PM #8
No deca for this guy either, just NPP
-
10-10-2007, 07:47 PM #9Originally Posted by RIP535
-
10-10-2007, 07:53 PM #10Originally Posted by dhriscerr
-
10-10-2007, 08:06 PM #11New Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 13
that means i benched 2.99 times my body weight plus coeficient sorry
-
10-10-2007, 08:17 PM #12Originally Posted by RIP535
-
10-10-2007, 08:31 PM #13New Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 13
the higher the % the more likely you are to be tested
-
10-10-2007, 09:15 PM #14
IMO if you are trying to break records and the original holder did it natty and you used AS - it's not the same, but congrats on a great lift and by no means am I taking away from your work, but with the taboo of steroids right now trying to break records or what ever will now and forever be questioned - just the way it is now.
-
10-10-2007, 10:00 PM #15New Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 13
i agree 100% in my fed i compete in an open division admitting i have taken aas there is a pure division witch only "pure" lifters compete if they want they can come into the open and lift if they want. by the wat thank for the compliment i realy do appretiate it fyi i pressed 540 @ 200 in a single ply shirt not bragging just proud of it it definatly caught the judges eye geyss the testing was warrented im just confused how it was positive after so long off
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Tren Cycle (blast)
01-06-2025, 11:29 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS