Thread: which is more supressive?
-
11-24-2007, 08:08 PM #1
which is more supressive?
alright so my question is... what would deliver a harder blow to your hpta system. 4 weeks on those designer orals like sd,pp,hd, or a 12 week cycle on test.
people say that the designers(especially sd) are very suppresive, but to what extent?
or say would a 4 week cycle of methyl tren be as suppresive as a 16 week test/deca stack?
which of these would be harder to recover from? short oral cycles or long inj. cycles.
thanks
-
11-24-2007, 08:10 PM #2
exogenous hormones suppress endogenous production.
there is no such thing as being more than 100% shut down, but the test will fully shut you down in a couple weeks.
4 weeks on pro h is going to shut you down to a degree, but not as much as 12 weeks of test.
those 4 weeks of pro h are going to be a lot harder on your liver than the test would be though.
a 16 week test/deca stack will shut you down in a day. a 100mg shot of deca results in 100% hpta suppression within a day.
19nors such as deca and tren are the most suppressive compounds and require a solid pct to recover from
-
11-24-2007, 08:14 PM #3
are you worried more about which one shuts you down for longer or which one will give you results. Seems to me like you are looking at this backwards.
1-figure out what you want.2- figure out the safest way to get that done. 3 pct
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
SVT and steroids?
Yesterday, 09:28 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS