Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: ttokkyo eq 200 vs. QV eq 200

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Central, NJ
    Posts
    73

    ttokkyo eq 200 vs. QV eq 200

    Planning an upcomming bulking cycle and are wondering which type of eq i should use. The two i have access too are ttokkyo eq 200 or QV eq 200. I get them for about the same price. Any suggestions? Thanks bros.

  2. #2
    get the quality vet....thats what im gunna get this weekend from mexico.....

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    3,137
    pretty much the same thing ,used both with same resaults.matter or of prefference.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    In a cage near you...
    Posts
    4,721
    Originally posted by big N
    pretty much the same thing ,used both with same resaults.matter or of prefference.
    Bingo...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Posts
    323
    hey beachbod, id go with the QV like i told you on the phone.. see you in class.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    177
    I prefer QV over TT but both are basicly the same.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,612
    I've used the TT at 400mg/wk and was pleased with my results(being my first cycle). TT tends to underfill their vials though so plan on buying that extra one. I've got QV on order right now. I have yet to hear anything negative about them. Good Luck.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Central, NJ
    Posts
    73
    How underfilled are we usually talking. I am looking to buy 2 10ml bottles at 200mgs. I am getting them for $125, how many cc's have you seen underfilled?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,612
    I originally bought 2 vials. Thats all I needed at 400mg/wk for 10wks. One had about 8.5ml and the other around 9. I had to purchase an extra one to complete my cycle. I've heard them being as low as 8ml. $125 seems a little steep, dude. I could almost buy two for that price.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    mass
    Posts
    647
    Originally posted by 01dragonslayer
    I originally bought 2 vials. Thats all I needed at 400mg/wk for 10wks. One had about 8.5ml and the other around 9. I had to purchase an extra one to complete my cycle. I've heard them being as low as 8ml. $125 seems a little steep, dude. I could almost buy two for that price.

    http://www.anabolicreview.com/vbulle...derfilled+vial

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,612
    I'm am not trying to give TT a bad name. It's an excellent product and like I had mentioned I was very pleased with my results. Made me lean and vascular. But I compared my vials and I've seen pictures where they were filled to different levels. TT is inconsistent in filling their vials

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    1,116
    Hey Bro, just thought I'd say that I recently did research on this same topic before I got my gear. I ended up going with QV, not b/c of bad things said about TT. It was just that there were a lot of good things said about QV. I've only had 2 injects so far, so I don't have enough personal experience to pass along.

    9

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,612
    Exactly, Trimunex. When I first bought my gear QV was barely in the market. There was not enough feedback(opinions). I went with TT b/c of the high mg/ml(alot less injects) and at the time it was one of the best EQ you could buy. Since then QV has made a reputation and I figure "why not"?

  14. #14
    Qv workrd better for me than TT.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •