Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    soccer#3's Avatar
    soccer#3 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The 50 States
    Posts
    2,555

    Short frequent vs long less frequent cycles

    say someone is tryin to bulk or whatever goals the person might have. whats the correct way to go? short frequent cycles or long less frequent cycles. in short cycles im thinkin no more than 10 weeks and long cycles im thinkin at least 16 weeks. which would u choose?

  2. #2
    soccer#3's Avatar
    soccer#3 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The 50 States
    Posts
    2,555
    bump

  3. #3
    Bigmax's Avatar
    Bigmax is offline Retired VET~ If you dont know... ask me
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    yeah thats me in avvy
    Posts
    5,669
    short cycles would be more like 6-8 weeks bro...using of course fast acting compounds...correct way to go???...thats a matter of invidual bro...i like short cycles for bulk or cut...

  4. #4
    soccer#3's Avatar
    soccer#3 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The 50 States
    Posts
    2,555
    i cant make up my mind. im tryin to bulk im tryin to avoid the fast acting compounds cuz of their frequent injections. not that i cant take it but cuz last i did prop i had someone helpin me wit injections. the only place i can self-inject are the thighs.

    i was thinkin about doin deca and test e for 10 weeks several times during this year. too short?

  5. #5
    soccer#3's Avatar
    soccer#3 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The 50 States
    Posts
    2,555
    bump for mas

  6. #6
    djcj2002's Avatar
    djcj2002 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    180
    Personally I wouldn't do deca less than 12 weeks. And I'm pretty sure you would want to run the test 2 weeks past the deca. Even if you planned on a 10 week deca, that would give you a normal 12 week cycle.

  7. #7
    soccer#3's Avatar
    soccer#3 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The 50 States
    Posts
    2,555
    i know what ur sayin and im well aware of it.

    im just wonderin, if u were to bulk, and considering all aspects of a cycle (time, money, results) which type of cycle would u go for? the shorter fast acting ones or the longer slow acting ones?

  8. #8
    Jeff1's Avatar
    Jeff1 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    474
    Blog Entries
    1
    10 weeks is where i like to be myself

  9. #9
    legobricks's Avatar
    legobricks is offline Retired AR Monitor
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    5,150
    I prefer 12 week cycles or longer myself due to pinning only twice a week. Have not messed with short cycles yet as pinning ED is not what im looking forward too but I think now it wont be a problem. Another advantage of shorter cycles is less time off before getting back on again. For bulking its only a matter of opnion as diet is where it lies. For instance, Tren and Prop cna be used to bulk as Tren is a great bulker but it can also be used to cut, all about hte diet and how you go about it.

  10. #10
    Schmidty's Avatar
    Schmidty is offline Test Is Best!
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    6,899
    I used2do the short cycles n i just dont get enough out of them really. N im sick of stickn myself everymorning

  11. #11
    soccer#3's Avatar
    soccer#3 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The 50 States
    Posts
    2,555
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff1 View Post
    10 weeks is where i like to be myself
    10 weeks sounds about right to me. not too long and not too short

  12. #12
    soccer#3's Avatar
    soccer#3 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The 50 States
    Posts
    2,555
    Quote Originally Posted by legobricks View Post
    I prefer 12 week cycles or longer myself due to pinning only twice a week. Have not messed with short cycles yet as pinning ED is not what im looking forward too but I think now it wont be a problem. Another advantage of shorter cycles is less time off before getting back on again. For bulking its only a matter of opnion as diet is where it lies. For instance, Tren and Prop cna be used to bulk as Tren is a great bulker but it can also be used to cut, all about hte diet and how you go about it.
    congrats on ur new status as a monitor bro.

    tren is something i never wanna try. seems a lil too hardcore for me. i'll definetly up my cals when i get on. i havent cycle for over 1.5 yrs. cant wait to get back at it again

  13. #13
    soccer#3's Avatar
    soccer#3 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The 50 States
    Posts
    2,555
    Quote Originally Posted by Schmidty View Post
    I used2do the short cycles n i just dont get enough out of them really. N im sick of stickn myself everymorning
    yeah something tells me the longer cycles are the way to go. i know what those frequent injections can be like, not fun

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •