View Poll Results: Should we Ban Talk of Source Shipping?

Voters
30. You may not vote on this poll

  • Packaging Techniques Talk

    18 60.00%

  • Shipping Techniques Talk

    16 53.33%

  • Shipping Talk in General

    26 86.67%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 24 of 24

Thread: Let's Vote on it Then...

  1. 03-18-2008, 07:15 AM #1
    ecto9's Avatar
    ecto9 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Online
    Posts
    988

    Let's Vote on it Then...

    This is the first time I'm doing a poll, so please excuse me if it doesn't come out right...lol...:

    Who here thinks we should ban all talk of packaging techniques, shipping techniques and even talk of product shipping in general?

    We all realize that the "Cat's out of the bag" so to speak, right? But I believe that's no reason why we shouldn't start now to put some kinda policy in place to include: Shipping talk of any kind, huh?

    What do you all think...???

    Keep Bumped...
    Last edited by ecto9; 03-18-2008 at 07:34 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 03-18-2008, 09:34 AM #2
    lex57's Avatar
    lex57 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,747
    i dont believe there is any purpose to discuss any of it at all.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 03-18-2008, 09:39 AM #3
    Nstart is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    361
    What a stupid thread.

    Those designated by the forum to filter content are doing a great job as it is.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 03-18-2008, 09:42 AM #4
    jAcKeD!!!!'s Avatar
    jAcKeD!!!! is offline chemically engineered
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    On, CANADA
    Posts
    1,914
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 03-18-2008, 09:43 AM #5
    New2Anabolic's Avatar
    New2Anabolic is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    864

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by jAcKeD!!!! View Post
    ^_^
    .
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 03-18-2008, 04:19 PM #6
    RapaciousShark's Avatar
    RapaciousShark is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    906
    Quote Originally Posted by Nstart View Post
    What a stupid thread.

    Those designated by the forum to filter content are doing a great job as it is.
    if I was a d-bag watching for info on shipping then I would have plenty of opportunities to find what I'm looking for here.

    Plus noobs like me don't know what's safe to discuss so we need people to tell us.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 03-18-2008, 04:24 PM #7
    ottomaddox's Avatar
    ottomaddox is offline "Better Safe Than Sorry"
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Fairfax,CA.
    Posts
    2,960
    Read the Rules!!!!!!!!



    Quote Originally Posted by RapaciousShark View Post
    Plus noobs like me don't know what's safe to discuss so we need people to tell us.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 03-18-2008, 04:48 PM #8
    RapaciousShark's Avatar
    RapaciousShark is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    906
    Quote Originally Posted by ottomaddox View Post
    Read the Rules!!!!!!!!
    yes, thankyou. I think you missed the point of my post.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 03-18-2008, 04:56 PM #9
    Big's Avatar
    Big is offline Retired~ AR-Hall of Famer ~ "Enforcer"
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    28,651
    Personally I would like to ban any source or shipping related talk at all. This should be a board to discuss the theoretical usage of compounds people may or may not obtain on their own, not to discuss sources and shipping methods.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 03-18-2008, 05:25 PM #10
    JAY_WD's Avatar
    JAY_WD is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    861
    Quote Originally Posted by Big View Post
    Personally I would like to ban any source or shipping related talk at all. This should be a board to discuss the theoretical usage of compounds people may or may not obtain on their own, not to discuss sources and shipping methods.
    AGREED!!!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 03-18-2008, 05:31 PM #11
    PT's Avatar
    PT is offline DUNAMIS ~ AR-Elite Hall of Famer~
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    12,158
    i agree and was trying to say that this morning when i was at work and ended up with a ton of emails swearing at me. everyone thinks that the cops know what we know but they dont always. sources switch up there methods all the time to get around this and i saw at least 3 posts today of people posting another new method in the open. all these people pm'd me and i told them how to do what they wanted and i wish they would of just done that in the first place. big, you obviously know how bad things have got in the last 3 years and thats why your against this as i am. everyone needs to use there brains more and stop helping le because they get alot of there intelligance from this and many other boards
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 03-18-2008, 07:16 PM #12
    malidfa's Avatar
    malidfa is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    OZ
    Posts
    526
    [/QUOTE]everyone needs to use there brains more and stop helping le because they get alot of there intelligance from this and many other boards[/QUOTE]


    100% agreed
    we need to stop this crap its only going to get harder and harder
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 03-18-2008, 07:23 PM #13
    legobricks's Avatar
    legobricks is offline Retired AR Monitor
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    5,150
    Ban it all from being openly discussion on the board. PM only WITH RESTRICTIONS. We can stop/control from this point on the questions being asked that are compromising shipping procedures.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 03-18-2008, 07:28 PM #14
    sphincter is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    750
    I vote to ban all talk of it since it serves no purpose on this board given it's stated purpose. It is a place to discuss compounds and in no way to discuss anything to do with how they are obtained or sent/shipped/whatever.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 03-18-2008, 07:31 PM #15
    samcam's Avatar
    samcam is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Who wants to know?
    Posts
    301
    Quote Originally Posted by ecto9 View Post
    This is the first time I'm doing a poll, so please excuse me if it doesn't come out right...lol...:

    Who here thinks we should ban all talk of packaging techniques, shipping techniques and even talk of product shipping in general?

    We all realize that the "Cat's out of the bag" so to speak, right? But I believe that's no reason why we shouldn't start now to put some kinda policy in place to include: Shipping talk of any kind, huh?

    What do you all think...???

    Keep Bumped...
    I thought it was already banned???
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 03-18-2008, 07:35 PM #16
    legobricks's Avatar
    legobricks is offline Retired AR Monitor
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    5,150
    Unfortunately it is not banned. What is against the rules is UGL discussion. The shipping/packaging methods talk is not officially in the rules yet in which they should be. The monitors/mods would tell members to edit their posts when it came to packaging methods described or shipping methods so it wouldnt compromise the companies due to LE. This rule SHOULD officially be put in place.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 03-18-2008, 07:40 PM #17
    jbonez19 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia.
    Posts
    1,438
    Quote Originally Posted by lex57 View Post
    i dont believe there is any purpose to discuss any of it at all.
    completely agree with lex. there is nothing to be gained, there is plenty to be lost. don't do it.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 03-18-2008, 07:45 PM #18
    jbonez19 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia.
    Posts
    1,438
    Quote Originally Posted by pietro75 View Post
    i agree and was trying to say that this morning when i was at work and ended up with a ton of emails swearing at me. everyone thinks that the cops know what we know but they dont always. sources switch up there methods all the time to get around this and i saw at least 3 posts today of people posting another new method in the open. all these people pm'd me and i told them how to do what they wanted and i wish they would of just done that in the first place. big, you obviously know how bad things have got in the last 3 years and thats why your against this as i am. everyone needs to use there brains more and stop helping le because they get alot of there intelligance from this and many other boards
    i personally think that the people that e-mailed pietro swearing must be idiots and they should be banned also. don't worry p, u have the support of the people who actually have a clue about this stuff.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 03-18-2008, 07:49 PM #19
    Big's Avatar
    Big is offline Retired~ AR-Hall of Famer ~ "Enforcer"
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    28,651
    Quote Originally Posted by pietro75 View Post
    i agree and was trying to say that this morning when i was at work and ended up with a ton of emails swearing at me.
    If you still have them could you forward those to me? Thanks bro.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. 03-19-2008, 02:21 AM #20
    Jeff1's Avatar
    Jeff1 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    474
    How will talking about this remedy anything???
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  21. 03-19-2008, 02:22 AM #21
    Jeff1's Avatar
    Jeff1 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    474
    How will talking about this remedy anything???
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  22. 03-19-2008, 05:38 AM #22
    samcam's Avatar
    samcam is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Who wants to know?
    Posts
    301
    Quote Originally Posted by legobricks View Post
    Unfortunately it is not banned. What is against the rules is UGL discussion. The shipping/packaging methods talk is not officially in the rules yet in which they should be. The monitors/mods would tell members to edit their posts when it came to packaging methods described or shipping methods so it wouldnt compromise the companies due to LE. This rule SHOULD officially be put in place.
    Oh really........I guess I just assumed it was banned because common sense should tell you not to discuss it in the first place.........but I guess not everyone has common sense.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  23. 03-19-2008, 10:11 AM #23
    ecto9's Avatar
    ecto9 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Online
    Posts
    988
    Quote Originally Posted by pietro75 View Post
    i agree and was trying to say that this morning when i was at work and ended up with a ton of emails swearing at me. everyone thinks that the cops know what we know but they dont always. sources switch up there methods all the time to get around this and i saw at least 3 posts today of people posting another new method in the open. all these people pm'd me and i told them how to do what they wanted and i wish they would of just done that in the first place. big, you obviously know how bad things have got in the last 3 years and thats why your against this as i am. everyone needs to use there brains more and stop helping le because they get alot of there intelligance from this and many other boards
    That's what I'm talking about bro...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  24. 03-19-2008, 07:12 PM #24
    ecto9's Avatar
    ecto9 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Online
    Posts
    988
    I should of included a poll spot for ppl to vote for allowing talk of it, but I think this is pretty much in agreement with most here...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Download FREE 396 Page Steroid Book/Guide!!▲

396 Pages of Anabolic Steroid resources, techniques and facts. Discover the best types of Steroids to use to reach specific goals and outcomes.