Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    johnq is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    414

    fast acting vs long esters

    why would some of you guys prefere long esters such as test e deca tren e which takes 5 to 7 weeks to kick in, when you could have fast acting gear such as tren a test p where u could start to see results soon as the 1st week, i now theirs more injections that not to much of a problem, and i now with long esters u can frontload or take an oral to start gains sooner but why would you want to do that for, dont flame me guys just trying to learn more.

  2. #2
    Baba is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Chitown
    Posts
    348
    Everyday injections with long ester is definately as good convinience.

  3. #3
    gixxerboy1's Avatar
    gixxerboy1 is offline ~VET~ Extraordinaire~
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    32,803
    Quote Originally Posted by Baba View Post
    Everyday injections with long ester is definately as good convinience.
    why would you do ed injections with long esters?

  4. #4
    Lemonada8's Avatar
    Lemonada8 is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Read my blog
    Posts
    3,691
    Blog Entries
    2
    I dont know, i think that it has to do w/ the number of injections... some people just dont like it.... personally i love prop!

  5. #5
    johnq is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    414
    never tried prop, i will defo try it next cycle

  6. #6
    eljugo16's Avatar
    eljugo16 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    the CITY
    Posts
    354
    with shorter esters there is more of the actual compound per cc (test for example) than with longer ones. The longer the ester the less of the actual compound you get. Also when the ester is longer you retain more water. Some people really dont like ED shots so they think the pros outweigh the cons and go with longer ones. Personally IMO short esters are the best.

  7. #7
    johnq is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    414
    i think short esters r the best aswell, i dont think jabbing ed or eod is to much of a prob. y would people want that water weight look for i dont like that puffy look myself.
    puggle1!!! after reading A. Roberts article which would you prefer.

  8. #8
    ZEUS3 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    swansea
    Posts
    250
    prop is f**king great my strenth goes through the roof but i usuly add a long acting esser also like test 400 or test e

  9. #9
    G-1000's Avatar
    G-1000 is offline Cycle King/AR-Hall of Famer/RETIRED
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    14,423
    Blog Entries
    1
    Because when your shooting test susp tren -a igf and gh it starts to get old quick with 6 injections a day.

  10. #10
    Peducho0113 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Chicago IL
    Posts
    1,419
    Some people don't mind injections, some would, but I think at the end is really how your body reacts to either long or short.

  11. #11
    Deen54 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    784
    well i guess test prop you would need more bottles as you are injecting
    everyday then the test enthanate..you inject twice or once weekly so
    convenience is the only benefit and maybe cost.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •