Printable View
Hey guys, quick question, just looking for some educated opinions. I am running a 250mg per week test cycle of 10 weeks. I was wondering if it would be wise to front load and then run only 9 weeks.(500mg week 1 then 250mg 2-9) Obviously I only have 10ml dosed at 250mg /ml. I realise 250mg a week is lower than most would run but I have made the decision. any opinions?.
I have tried frontloading and decided its not worth it.. Didnt do much for me ..everyone is difrent so perhaps try it and see if its for you
There was an excellent post that showed in numbers why front loading works out very well and puts you at the levels you want to be at by week two. I can't look for it at the moment now, but the general consensus was front loading is definitely worth it.
http://forums.steroid.com/anabolic-steroids-questions-answers/350144-frontloading-test.html <--- About halfway down on the page
I frontloaded my test and i love it. Depending on the ester, lets say you using a long one like enthante or cyp. Why wait for wk 4-5 for it to "kick in" when you can have it "kick in" at week 2. Thats more time you can build and reach or pass your goals. I would frontload.
how would u front load with sust and decca?
cheers guys, yeah i think i'll front load. this is my first cycle so i'm being quite mild. but considering most guys start off with 500mg per week for their first cycle i figure i'll blast into it then sit back and see how 250mg a week goes. i'm assuming it will be much of a muchness but if it helps it kick in earlier, why not.
Go for it Danny, couldn't hurt. I always frontload, personal preferance.
I think frontloading will be my policy too. But frontloading is more for longer esters.