different cycle

**wmrebel** · 07-05-2008, 12:08 PM

I made a thread a couple of days ago about a tren only cycle and some of the gurus on here helped me out and steared me far away from that. Most of the responses stated that i was too young at the age of 18 but i have to decided that im going to do a cycle. I got rid of the tren and got come test c 100cc dosed at 200mg per cc. I want to run a low dosage since i am so young and just want a little boost in the weight room. Would 250mg a week be enough to make a difference of would i be better off with the natural test that my body makes? Any and all help is appreciated.

**wmrebel** · 07-05-2008, 12:09 PM

10cc* not 100.

PT · 07-05-2008, 12:12 PM

if i were in your shoes i would stay natural. check out the diet and lifting forum and read read

**MercyDog** · 07-05-2008, 12:47 PM

Originally Posted by wmrebel

10cc* not 100.

That caught my eye too, thought santa claus came early this year.

If all you have is 10ml of 200 then your short for a cycle

PT · 07-05-2008, 12:59 PM

Originally Posted by MercyDog

That caught my eye too, thought santa claus came early this year.

If all you have is 10ml of 200 then your short for a cycle

exactly, thats only 5 weeks at 400mgs a week and it needs to be run for 10 weeks min. i still stand behind my last post that you should stay natural

**gixxerboy1** · 07-05-2008, 01:00 PM

i agree stay natural. With what you have its not worth it anyway

**wmrebel** · 07-05-2008, 05:33 PM

im sure i could get more gear and thats one of the reasons i was looking to run only 250mg a week for a longer amount of time, but i think ill take yalls advice and stay natural for now.