Omnadren Vs Sust

**Alex_235** · 07-10-2008, 09:35 AM

Any real difference between Omnadren and Sust....

I know many think its inferior due to the lower price but any one have real word comparisons?

I've done 4 cycles with Sust and love it but if omnadren is cheaper it's hard not to justify it.

**Ir0n** · 07-10-2008, 09:38 AM

read the profile for omnadren . one of it's esters is different and thats that. test = test. If you can get omnadren for less - go for it.

**Mind** · 07-10-2008, 10:03 AM

you'll get more acne from Omnadren than sustanon .

**redz** · 07-10-2008, 10:11 AM

you'll get more acne from Omnadren than sustanon.

I would like to see some proof of that..... Test is Test as long as you administer the right injection frequency to keep blood levels stable neither will give more acne than the other.

**Alex_235** · 07-10-2008, 11:14 AM

i've read the profiles and know they are slightly chemically different, i was just looking at result differences.

**Crest** · 07-10-2008, 11:20 AM

omnas are good, im on them now. sides will be the same as they are practically the same drug.

'you'll get more acne from Omnadren than sustanon .'

im on dbol and omna and get no acne, its an individual thing. also omna's are faked less as they are already cheap

**HORSE~** · 07-10-2008, 11:24 AM

Originally Posted by Alex_235

i've read the profiles and know they are slightly chemically different, i was just looking at result differences.

The only result difference would be the weight of your wallet....

Buy the cheaper of the two the results in gains will be the same....

**MR_T** · 07-10-2008, 02:22 PM

there are less omna fakes out there too.... just something to think about

**JiGGaMaN** · 07-10-2008, 02:30 PM

They are both equally shitty, but man omnas are cheap. Thats the only reasonable justification for using them. Anyone who uses brand name sustanon is not very bright and misinformed at best.

**Kratos** · 07-10-2008, 02:33 PM

they are so similar, just buy the cheaper one

**CheddaNips** · 07-10-2008, 02:35 PM

just did 750mgs/wk Omnas a week and loved it. Can't see sust being any better than Omnas were.

**one8nine** · 07-10-2008, 04:30 PM

they are both great compounds if your goal is to choose a blend so that it is impossible to get stable blood levels as opposed to a single ester

**MR_T** · 07-10-2008, 05:22 PM

omna all the way, especially if the sust is ug..

**JiGGaMaN** · 07-10-2008, 05:30 PM

Originally Posted by one8nine

they are both great compounds if your goal is to choose a blend so that it is impossible to get stable blood levels as opposed to a single ester

Exactly, its the #1 choice of newcomers who assume 4 is better than 1. Great selling point which is why people who know nothing always end up with it.

**CheddaNips** · 07-10-2008, 10:44 PM

Originally Posted by JiGGaMaN

Exactly, its the #1 choice of newcomers who assume 4 is better than 1. Great selling point which is why people who know nothing always end up with it.

So all the people i can name that have used Omnas and sust on this board have no Idea what we are doing and are newbs who know nothing about AAS?

**Crest** · 07-11-2008, 02:29 AM

used test e amd omna's there no dif in sides and cant say iv noticed much difference in the amount iv gained, although im running them in 2 dif cycles