Results 1 to 5 of 5
Thread: Statistically Significant?
-
07-14-2008, 05:12 PM #1
Statistically Significant?
Over and over again, I see people asking about height/weight/bodyfat/macronutrients, just so they can bash them and say "too young" "not large enough naturally" etc. In my opinion this serves no constructive purpose as the people that are posting requesting information/guidance will do a cycle regardless. Also, just because they say im 6'6 400lbs doesnt make it so. These people are at least intelligent enough to seek out some guidance, which is better than most users, so why bash on them right off the bat? Lets stop all the hating and try and be more productive.
-
-
07-14-2008, 05:26 PM #3
-
07-14-2008, 05:40 PM #4
In the time I've been here I have encountered countless young dudes who wanted to cycle, then posted stats showing to be 5'11" and 145lbs or something along those lines. Many of these guys really thought their diet was sufficient, or had no real idea of diet at all. Many have actually listened, put juice on hold and pm'd me for diet tips, and followed up with me later stating their progress. Sure some guys are going to lie or post bs stats, but I'm not going to direct someone to cycle who is clearly not ready without first at least trying to point them in the right direction. These guys want to get big, and I want to help them do it safely and responsibly. If someone is drastically underweight, runs a cycle, puffs up a bit, then loses the gains as quickly as they came at the same time they are experiencing hormone fluctuations through pct, depression often sets in. I want our members to be satisfied with their long term gains and I advise accordingly. Even if only one out of ten listen and learn it's worth me repeating it, in my opinion.
-
07-14-2008, 05:47 PM #5
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS