Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 57
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    662

    Question First time Eq user

    im going to be using eq for the first time in my next cycle. I've read the profile and it's sound alot better than what everybody else says. is 400mg/week enough or would i need more? if so, whats a good dose to get results from it?

  2. #2
    ShadetreeJones is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    482
    400 is exactly the amount I used. I loved it. Tons of vascularity and kept literally everything I put on. Dropped some fat also and had zero sides. If you're just a regular guy not looking to get cartoonish big, then eq is definitely for you.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    662
    Quote Originally Posted by ShadetreeJones View Post
    400 is exactly the amount I used. I loved it. Tons of vascularity and kept literally everything I put on. Dropped some fat also and had zero sides. If you're just a regular guy not looking to get cartoonish big, then eq is definitely for you.
    im 21 years old and i already stand out everywhere i go, even the gym. im not a regular guy and i wanna get alot bigger, but i just want to try out eq and get as much as i can get out of it

  4. #4
    theboss's Avatar
    theboss is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    CANADA!
    Posts
    474
    EQ is fairly mild....what else are you using with it?

  5. #5
    ShadetreeJones is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    482
    Quote Originally Posted by bossman_1986 View Post
    im 21 years old and i already stand out everywhere i go, even the gym. im not a regular guy and i wanna get alot bigger, but i just want to try out eq and get as much as i can get out of it
    Eq is not for you.

  6. #6
    passthetest's Avatar
    passthetest is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    639
    yah if you are trying to get alot bigger than I wouldnt recomend taking it unless you incorporate a decent amount of test with it.


    let's get some stats so we know exactly how to help.

  7. #7
    TJM7275 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    No Steroids for you..NEXT
    Posts
    2,636
    I ran Eq at 400mg along with 500mg of Cyp.. A little more vascular and a great appetite but thats about it. Run it at 600mg if you want my opinion

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    662
    Quote Originally Posted by theboss View Post
    EQ is fairly mild....what else are you using with it?
    cypionate , eq, anavar

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    662
    Quote Originally Posted by passthetest View Post
    yah if you are trying to get alot bigger than I wouldnt recomend taking it unless you incorporate a decent amount of test with it.


    let's get some stats so we know exactly how to help.
    im going to be taking 500mg/week of cypionate

    21 years old, 5'9, 220 pounds, 12%-14% bodyfat

    another thing i'll let you know is that im concerned about hairloss and im prone to it so i want to keep my hair as long as possible so i'll be taking propecia too

  10. #10
    Bulldog1115 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    587
    well eq is mild but i think deca is more for u but if ur heart is set on Eq then u need to run either anadrol or dianabol along side of it if u desire to get big

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    662
    Quote Originally Posted by Bulldog1115 View Post
    well eq is mild but i think deca is more for u but if ur heart is set on Eq then u need to run either anadrol or dianabol along side of it if u desire to get big
    yea i use deca but i want to try other things. all i have ever used is enanthate , deca, d-bol...but im gonna stop using d-bol from now on, i've noticed alot of hair thinning for it

  12. #12
    Bulldog1115 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    587
    hair thinning coulld be fromm deca as well as the test so....have u used tren ?

  13. #13
    SNUKA's Avatar
    SNUKA is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    long island, new york
    Posts
    566
    run the eq at 600mg or better for atleast 12weeks this is from my personal experience

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    662
    Quote Originally Posted by Bulldog1115 View Post
    hair thinning coulld be fromm deca as well as the test so....have u used tren?
    i know its from the d-bol cause it was only the first 4 weeks that my hair got thin but then when i stopped the d-bol i didnt notice anymore shedding or thinning

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    662
    Quote Originally Posted by SNUKA View Post
    run the eq at 600mg or better for atleast 12weeks this is from my personal experience
    thats what people keep telling me but im thinking since its my first time using it wouldnt 400mg be enough?

  16. #16
    legobricks's Avatar
    legobricks is offline Retired AR Monitor
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    5,150
    test prop and tren ace.

    test cyp or enanthate and tren enanthate or tren ace.

    Either combo will work but you'll like the results better then deca . EQ is crap, mild, and doesnt do anything in terms of real muscle growth IMO. It takes way to long to reach peak blood concentration and the results arent all that great. Id rather spend money on something else.

    Have you thought about lowering your test and upping your deca? Yes deca can affect the hairline but it is usually rare and if so just mildly. Have you looked into tren at all?

  17. #17
    legobricks's Avatar
    legobricks is offline Retired AR Monitor
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    5,150
    Quote Originally Posted by bossman_1986 View Post
    thats what people keep telling me but im thinking since its my first time using it wouldnt 400mg be enough?
    How many cycles have you done?


    My first go with EQ i ran 600mg EW for 13week and Test E for 14weeks. Results were nice, became more hard, a bit more vascular but i attribute most of my gains to the test.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    662
    Quote Originally Posted by legobricks View Post
    test prop and tren ace.

    test cyp or enanthate and tren enanthate or tren ace.

    Either combo will work but you'll like the results better then deca . EQ is crap, mild, and doesnt do anything in terms of real muscle growth IMO. It takes way to long to reach peak blood concentration and the results arent all that great. Id rather spend money on something else.

    Have you thought about lowering your test and upping your deca? Yes deca can affect the hairline but it is usually rare and if so just mildly. Have you looked into tren at all?
    yea i wanted to do tren but i know its very androgenic and that its very possible it'll make my hair fall out thats why im looking into things that are easier on the hair. my plan is still to get as big as possible and deca is really helping me get there but i dont want to use it twice a year just yet because im starting to do 2 cycles a year now

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    662
    Quote Originally Posted by legobricks View Post
    How many cycles have you done?


    My first go with EQ i ran 600mg EW for 13week and Test E for 14weeks. Results were nice, became more hard, a bit more vascular but i attribute most of my gains to the test.
    i've done 3 cycles, im still a rookie but steroids are working very well for me
    i did a first cycle then took 8 months off then did another cycle and took another 8 months off and now i wanna start only doing 4 months off and im planning to do my next cycle in about a month

  20. #20
    legobricks's Avatar
    legobricks is offline Retired AR Monitor
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    5,150
    Id lower the test and up the deca then if you dont want to mess with tren yet. If your genetics are that you'll be bald then its just a matter of time before you loose it all.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    662
    Quote Originally Posted by legobricks View Post
    Id lower the test and up the deca then if you dont want to mess with tren yet. If your genetics are that you'll be bald then its just a matter of time before you loose it all.
    i used dutasteride for the first time last cycle and i actually saw my hair getting thicker while on test but that was after the d-bol cause i noticed hair thinning at the start and then it got thicker while i was on the test and deca

  22. #22
    mkrulic is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    2,482
    vascularity can be achieved thru diet alone. if you ran this cycle and then ran the exact same w/ the eq dropped you would not be able to tell the difference between the two.

  23. #23
    ShadetreeJones is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    482
    Quote Originally Posted by bossman_1986 View Post
    cypionate, eq, anavar
    That's the same cycle I did except I used test e instead of c. It wasn't exactly a bulking cycle if that's what you're looking for. Great cycle for cutting down but I thought you were looking for a more powerful cycle.

  24. #24
    ShadetreeJones is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    482
    Quote Originally Posted by mkrulic View Post
    vascularity can be achieved thru diet alone. if you ran this cycle and then ran the exact same w/ the eq dropped you would not be able to tell the difference between the two.
    I don't know about that one dude. My bf is lower now than it was when I was on cycle with the eq and I'm definitely not as vascular as I was.

  25. #25
    troublesome is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    edmonton AB, canada
    Posts
    83
    400mgs will do good. 500 to 600mg/week for 12 weeks like buddy says is a whole lot better, you wont notice much at first.. give it 8 weeks HOLYSHIT! eq rocks

  26. #26
    tadpoleboyy is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    between corn and soybeans
    Posts
    866
    eq is great for gains without water weight. Go for 600mg/wk for at least 12 wks. And Frontload. Ive done that amount + 250mg test e/wk and made great gains. However, eq will not give you the most bang for your buck, its kinda like primo, but cheaper. EQ was very kind to my hairline too.

  27. #27
    mkrulic is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    2,482
    Quote Originally Posted by ShadetreeJones View Post
    I don't know about that one dude. My bf is lower now than it was when I was on cycle with the eq and I'm definitely not as vascular as I was.
    but was it the eq? did you run it by itself?

  28. #28
    tadpoleboyy is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    between corn and soybeans
    Posts
    866
    ive done two cycles, test 250mg/wk + eq 600mg/wk, and another cycle consisting of test 250mg/wk + deca 400mg/wk. The first one was a bit longer. I can say for sure that i was way way more veiny and hard when i used eq, but a lot bigger, puffy with the deca

  29. #29
    TJM7275 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    No Steroids for you..NEXT
    Posts
    2,636
    IMO unless your getting it for free, spend your money on something else... Just me though

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    662
    Quote Originally Posted by TJM7275 View Post
    IMO unless your getting it for free, spend your money on something else... Just me though
    what would be a good substitute for eq if you're doing a clean bulk and something easy on the hairline?

  31. #31
    Bulldog1115 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    587
    ummm dude just run propecia throught cycle and that shampoo stuff..and ur good to go!

  32. #32
    ShadetreeJones is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    482
    Quote Originally Posted by mkrulic View Post
    but was it the eq? did you run it by itself?
    It was definitely the eq. I ran anavar weeks 9-12 but the vascularity was already there.

    The stories of vascularity with eq certainly held true with me but the stories of increased appetite did not. My appetite actually decreased a little and when I threw in the anavar I had to literally choke down my food.

  33. #33
    ShadetreeJones is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    482
    Quote Originally Posted by bossman_1986 View Post
    what would be a good substitute for eq if you're doing a clean bulk and something easy on the hairline?
    Primo but that's considered very weak also but even though it's a dht my balding buddies have all said it has been easy on the hair.

  34. #34
    jackdup04's Avatar
    jackdup04 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    around
    Posts
    289
    Eq is the mildest aas imo...Results are very minimal if any 4me..If i use it I throw it in2 a great cut stack 4the hell of it like tren a/test p/mast ect....

  35. #35
    mkrulic is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    2,482
    Quote Originally Posted by ShadetreeJones View Post
    It was definitely the eq. I ran anavar weeks 9-12 but the vascularity was already there.

    The stories of vascularity with eq certainly held true with me but the stories of increased appetite did not. My appetite actually decreased a little and when I threw in the anavar I had to literally choke down my food.
    did you run eq by itself? Im guessing you ran test w/ it. my guess is that the vascularity would have been there if you just ran the test. eq is worthless. you will not notice the addition of this compound in your run

  36. #36
    tadpoleboyy is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    between corn and soybeans
    Posts
    866
    if you got xtra money to blow, get the eq. If youre on a budget, dont

  37. #37
    ShadetreeJones is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    482
    Quote Originally Posted by mkrulic View Post
    did you run eq by itself? Im guessing you ran test w/ it. my guess is that the vascularity would have been there if you just ran the test. eq is worthless. you will not notice the addition of this compound in your run
    Yeah I ran it with test enan. I realize everyone's body comp is different but for me eq made a HUGE difference in regards to vascularity.

    I remember talking to a buddy of mine on the phone while I was outside on my porch in about week 7. I looked down at my calf and with the way the moonlight was hitting it, I literally had tree branches crawling down the inside of my calf. Pretty badass. Didn't see it before and haven't seen it since. It was the eq.

  38. #38
    mkrulic is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    2,482
    Quote Originally Posted by ShadetreeJones View Post
    Yeah I ran it with test enan. I realize everyone's body comp is different but for me eq made a HUGE difference in regards to vascularity.

    I remember talking to a buddy of mine on the phone while I was outside on my porch in about week 7. I looked down at my calf and with the way the moonlight was hitting it, I literally had tree branches crawling down the inside of my calf. Pretty badass. Didn't see it before and haven't seen it since. It was the eq.
    it was the test. if you had run the test by itself this would have happened, assuming same d and e

  39. #39
    ShadetreeJones is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    482
    Quote Originally Posted by mkrulic View Post
    it was the test. if you had run the test by itself this would have happened, assuming same d and e
    Bro, it wasn't the test. I used the EXACT same test on my first cycle and had zero change. It was the eq. Trust me. Have you used it? Ok then...

  40. #40
    mkrulic is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    2,482
    Quote Originally Posted by ShadetreeJones View Post
    Bro, it wasn't the test. I used the EXACT same test on my first cycle and had zero change. It was the eq. Trust me. Have you used it? Ok then...
    why would you think I havent used it. I read the profile and was sold on it. just like everybody else who starts a thread like this one. I then I found it did nothing. I couldnt even tell it was in the run. a waste of money. most people report an increase in vasculatiry or appetite. neither of which requires aas. Ill I can say is pos works very well for you

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •