Results 1 to 10 of 10
Thread: injection times
-
08-06-2008, 12:24 PM #1
injection times
hey guys i was wondering if mon morning thursday night is often enough for tren enth? last time i ran it a little closer than this , but if 3.5 days is ok it will allow me to cut from 3 down to only 2 inj per week i run it with test cyp which i have ran at 3.5 days before with no sides. thanks for your help
-
08-06-2008, 01:22 PM #2
That's how I use my tren ent 200mgs per ml, mon/thurs.
-
08-06-2008, 01:32 PM #3
Thats fine bro..
-
08-06-2008, 02:30 PM #4
facile, do run it at 200mg per inj for 400 a wk? if so have you ever used it at 300 a wk and was therea a noticble difference? i weigh around 260 and was considering bumping to 400 a wk if its worth it.
-
08-06-2008, 02:44 PM #5Anabolic Voice of Reason
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Scenic Purgatory
- Posts
- 3,859
-
08-06-2008, 02:50 PM #6
I have heard varying opinions on this, I handle the sides well and like 400 mgs per week(i'm 233 currently), but am considering bumping it to 500 per week, as going4ripped mentioned, many run it higher.
I did run it at 600 mgs per week, and got amazing results, so I guess I am talking myself into bumping it up.
Have you done tren previously? if so how were the sides, night sweats, insomnia, decreased cardio capacity ? that's probably the question you need to ask. if you handled them well, try it at 400 mgs/wk.
-
08-07-2008, 08:12 AM #7
i 've used tren enth once before about 3 months ago and responded very well to it lots of lean mass and fat loss, and seperation. i ran it at 300 a wk with 500 a wk of test cyp. the problem is some people say more is better some peoplle say if 300 works stay there until it doesnt. the other problem is this batch of gear is from a different lab and is much darker like its supposed to be "dark tea like" so im concerend that maybe what i thought was tren last time was watered down perhaps. as far as side effects go i only got some mild imsomnia last time which i didnt mind, but also leads to me think maybe it was tren. bottom line is 300 of this batch maybe a hell of a lot more potent than the last 300 guess its it time to roll the dice ?
-
08-07-2008, 11:05 AM #8
you make a good point, different ugl's different actually strengths, if you responded well with 300 mgs, why not start there. With ent it is hard to tell how the sides will be until it kicks in, much easier with acetate, I have found the sides to vary to some degree, but recently my tren has come from very respectable labs and I haven't had any problem with running 400 per week, but I love tren.
I guess it is wise to be slightly conservative, many will say more is not always better.
-
08-07-2008, 11:35 AM #9
Start with 300 and go up if the sides don't present themselves, and you don't get results. If you are getting the results you want, stay with the 300.
-
08-07-2008, 12:48 PM #10
thanx for all the input guys .
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS