Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    rtex is offline New Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    43

    600mg EQ/wk too much for first time?

    I see 400mg as the norm, but what do y'all think about 600mg a week for 12 weeks run with sust and winny at the end? Is it too much or OK?

    -rtex

  2. #2
    Aragorn's Avatar
    Aragorn is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,071
    What are your reasons behind 600mg? More isn't always better.

    Aragorn

  3. #3
    sicilian40's Avatar
    sicilian40 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    250
    600 isnt gonna kill you but dude for your first time you will get great results with 400mg a week...600 is just too much for your first time i mean cmon...its better to be safe than sorry...

  4. #4
    Mike62200 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    166
    why are youplanning on running sust at the end with the winny?

  5. #5
    plucks's Avatar
    plucks is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    80
    Just to let you know i am cloes to finishing a cycle with eq at 400mg/wk and have had great results. I am also using winny at the end to harden up at the end. So liek everyone is saying more isn't always better

  6. #6
    mrdraco's Avatar
    mrdraco is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    City of Angels
    Posts
    83
    Go with EQ 400/wk. Run some test all the way thru, this will offset the HPTA shutdown. Add the Winny at the end to harden up.

    Example Cycle:
    EQ 400/wk 1-10
    Sust 400/wk 1-10
    Winny 100/EOD 8-12
    Clomid 13-15
    Clen 13-14 (Optional)

  7. #7
    Jenseno9's Avatar
    Jenseno9 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    922
    I wouldnt recommend running the EQ at 600mgs a week. I think it would be better to run the EQ at 400mg for lets say 15 weeks. With EQ the longer the better.
    Jens

  8. #8
    en1222's Avatar
    en1222 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Somewhere
    Posts
    918
    If you only got 50mg/ml a shot, that will be 12cc's a week. That is alot of shots to do .

  9. #9
    palme's Avatar
    palme is offline Rosie Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    6,589
    I have decided to run EQ @ 400mg/week for 12 weeks. Ive seen people go as far as 1000mg/week but they cant say they felt any difference.
    Imo EQ is suposed to be at a moderate dose for a longer time period for best effect.

  10. #10
    iron4life79's Avatar
    iron4life79 is offline Retired Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    the vast wasteland
    Posts
    3,790
    i agree with jenseno9,
    i think 400 would be plenty for a 1st time user, but i would run it longer.........much longer. at least 15 weeks. the general consensus amongst eq users that ive talked to is that dosage isnt the key, its longevity of cycle. so a lower dose, for a longer time yields better results.
    i an eq in my last cycle @600mg/week for 10 weeks. i wish i would have run at least 12, preferably 15.

    peace bb79

  11. #11
    rtex is offline New Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    43
    So how's this?
    1-15
    EQ 400mg
    1-10
    Sust 500mg
    12-17
    Winny 50mg
    18-20
    Clomid
    It seems a bit long don't you think? Where should I run clen with it?

  12. #12
    doublewide is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    248
    Yup, I think you are much better using the EQ for 15 weeks. It takes me so long to start seeing results with that.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •