Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    DDDNTZ's Avatar
    DDDNTZ is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    482

    Sublingual anadrol?

    Anyone have any experience with this? Ever used it or heard of it? I've used anadrol before but never seen it in sublingual form.

  2. #2
    DDDNTZ's Avatar
    DDDNTZ is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    482
    anyone?

  3. #3
    Amorphic's Avatar
    Amorphic is offline Veritas, Aequitas ~
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Canada - No source checks
    Posts
    16,146
    yes i have heard of it. the only guy that made it is no longer making them. heard mixed things about his sublingual products, i wouldnt use them

  4. #4
    DDDNTZ's Avatar
    DDDNTZ is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    482
    thanks for the info.is it hard to make it in sublingual form? if i knew of a ugl that made it would you think it was suspect?

  5. #5
    Amorphic's Avatar
    Amorphic is offline Veritas, Aequitas ~
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Canada - No source checks
    Posts
    16,146
    Quote Originally Posted by DDDNTZ View Post
    thanks for the info.is it hard to make it in sublingual form? if i knew of a ugl that made it would you think it was suspect?
    to my knowledge i only knew of one ugl that made it and he is no longer producing. i would say suspect, yes

  6. #6
    jimmyinkedup's Avatar
    jimmyinkedup is offline Disappointment* Known SCAMMER - Do Not Trust *
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Scamming my brothers
    Posts
    11,286
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by DDDNTZ View Post
    thanks for the info.is it hard to make it in sublingual form? if i knew of a ugl that made it would you think it was suspect?
    They mix compound with a carrier (hbcd) like was used in cyclo diol andro products. Supposedly it assures a high absorbtion rate...HOWEVER i would be suspect of these claims as drug companies are currently trying to use this with traditional medicines and not having the results they expected...prob why we dont see many sublingual prescription meds. The advantage is supposedly a lower dose(mgs) yields same results beacuse it bypasses the first pass mechanism in the liver... im sure if it worked well the drug companies would be all over it as it would same them $$ in lower medicine amounts needed for same results.

  7. #7
    UncleD's Avatar
    UncleD is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    inside my mind
    Posts
    426
    whats the point? works fine as it is?? who wants to hold a pill under there tounge for a half hour anyway

  8. #8
    LATS60's Avatar
    LATS60 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,662
    Quote Originally Posted by jimmyinkedup View Post
    They mix compound with a carrier (hbcd) like was used in cyclo diol andro products. Supposedly it assures a high absorbtion rate...HOWEVER i would be suspect of these claims as drug companies are currently trying to use this with traditional medicines and not having the results they expected...prob why we dont see many sublingual prescription meds. The advantage is supposedly a lower dose(mgs) yields same results beacuse it bypasses the first pass mechanism in the liver... im sure if it worked well the drug companies would be all over it as it would same them $$ in lower medicine amounts needed for same results.
    Well it's the same with orals bypassing the first pass.
    The trouble with sublingual is because it's a steroid , and with the added ester its very lipophillic. Since the mucous membranes in the mouth and nose only let hydrophilic substances through, the rate of absorption is extremely limited.

  9. #9
    jimmyinkedup's Avatar
    jimmyinkedup is offline Disappointment* Known SCAMMER - Do Not Trust *
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Scamming my brothers
    Posts
    11,286
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by LATS60 View Post
    Well it's the same with orals bypassing the first pass.
    The trouble with sublingual is because it's a steroid, and with the added ester its very lipophillic. Since the mucous membranes in the mouth and nose only let hydrophilic substances through, the rate of absorption is extremely limited.


    Hey lats - oral having an added ester?? Doesnt make sense to me...where am i off?? orals as far as i know have no added ester ...base compound 17aa so as an effective dose survives first pass. no ester .... orals while they are 17aa dont 100% survive first pass in the mg dosage you ingest... you have me curious ..can u explain?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •