Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    ChemWizard1 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    145

    High dose-shorter cycle better or worse?

    6'3" 230lbs. ~12% bf am 23 years old with 8 years training. Previous cycle experience is Test E 400mg/ week and Tren E 200mg/ week. Side effects were acne and slight hairloss.

    If I am acne prone and want best gains with less side effects would it be wiser to run cycle A or cycle B?

    Cycle A:
    Test E/Tren E 600mg/400mg each week for 10 weeks

    Cycle B:
    Test E/ Tren E 400mg/200mg for 14 weeks

  2. #2
    ChemWizard1 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    145
    Any thoughts or similar experience? I know both cycles will give me results but how much will the increased shorted dose affect my gains? Quicker but less solid? Or no difference?

  3. #3
    johnnybigguns is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    SOURCE CHECKS!
    Posts
    2,885
    Have you tried an AI at all like arimdex?
    Usually short burst cycle are around 4-6 weeks with short estered gear.
    Personally id go
    12 weeks test e 500-600mg and tren e 350mg

  4. #4
    ChemWizard1 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by johnnybigguns View Post
    Have you tried an AI at all like arimdex?
    Usually short burst cycle are around 4-6 weeks with short estered gear.
    Personally id go
    12 weeks test e 500-600mg and tren e 350mg
    I have used Letro while on cycle. Thanks for the advice bro

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •