Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: High dose-shorter cycle better or worse?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    145

    High dose-shorter cycle better or worse?

    6'3" 230lbs. ~12% bf am 23 years old with 8 years training. Previous cycle experience is Test E 400mg/ week and Tren E 200mg/ week. Side effects were acne and slight hairloss.

    If I am acne prone and want best gains with less side effects would it be wiser to run cycle A or cycle B?

    Cycle A:
    Test E/Tren E 600mg/400mg each week for 10 weeks

    Cycle B:
    Test E/ Tren E 400mg/200mg for 14 weeks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    145
    Any thoughts or similar experience? I know both cycles will give me results but how much will the increased shorted dose affect my gains? Quicker but less solid? Or no difference?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    SOURCE CHECKS!
    Posts
    2,885
    Have you tried an AI at all like arimdex?
    Usually short burst cycle are around 4-6 weeks with short estered gear.
    Personally id go
    12 weeks test e 500-600mg and tren e 350mg

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by johnnybigguns View Post
    Have you tried an AI at all like arimdex?
    Usually short burst cycle are around 4-6 weeks with short estered gear.
    Personally id go
    12 weeks test e 500-600mg and tren e 350mg
    I have used Letro while on cycle. Thanks for the advice bro

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •