deca or eq???? with sust

**daniel_3855** · 01-22-2009, 05:00 AM

sorry guys just 1 more question after reading loads of cycle logs with deca alot of the guys say wish i had used eq now instead of the deca?

what is eq?
is it better than deca?
is there anypoint in me swaping the deca for eq?
whats best for mass?

this my cycle

androlic 50mg ed 1-4
sust 500mg 1-12
deca 400mg 1-11
adex .25 eod

PT · 01-22-2009, 05:42 AM

deca is better for mass and eq is better if cutting

**Bossman** · 01-22-2009, 05:52 AM

The concensus on this forum is that EQ doesn't do too much. Ive taken EQ twice and was not impressed at 500mg per week. Some believe it needs to be dosed higher, 700-1000 per week to see more impressive gains. I may try this sometime, but Ive gotta find a good deal on EQ first.

Like PT said, EQ would be better for a cutter.

**LATS60** · 01-22-2009, 06:53 AM

Deca , every time.

**Jcoz** · 01-22-2009, 07:59 AM

Originally Posted by cgb6810

The concensus on this forum is that EQ doesn't do too much. Ive taken EQ twice and was not impressed at 500mg per week. Some believe it needs to be dosed higher, 700-1000 per week to see more impressive gains. I may try this sometime, but Ive gotta find a good deal on EQ first.

Like PT said, EQ would be better for a cutter.

Doesn't do much, or not much in the way of gains?

I'm sure for it to exist for so long and be at the prices its at, it serves a few purposes.

But as far as I knew Deca and EQ are not usually AAS that people are choosing between for bulk cycles, the title of the thread made me laugh a little, not trying to be a dick or anything.

OP, the above are (obviously) correct, if you're going for bulk, EQ really isn't interchangable with something like Deca. So as long as you are OK with the suppresion, go with the Deca.

Read the profile on EQ, its not known as a mass builder.

**jimmyinkedup** · 01-22-2009, 08:19 AM

Originally Posted by Jcoz

Doesn't do much, or not much in the way of gains?

I'm sure for it to exist for so long and be at the prices its at, it serves a few purposes.

But as far as I knew Deca and EQ are not usually AAS that people are choosing between for bulk cycles, the title of the thread made me laugh a little, not trying to be a dick or anything.

OP, the above are (obviously) correct, if you're going for bulk, EQ really isn't interchangable with something like Deca. So as long as you are OK with the suppresion, go with the Deca.

Read the profile on EQ, its not known as a mass builder.

many people incorporate eq in bulking cycles ....one main ancillary benefit to eq is a large increase in appetite ...particularly useful in a bulking cycle. To the OP ..its your call i like both but deca is def the better mass builder if that is your goal....

**Jcoz** · 01-22-2009, 08:29 AM

Originally Posted by jimmyinkedup

many people incorporate eq in bulking cycles ....one main ancillary benefit to eq is a large increase in appetite ...particularly useful in a bulking cycle. To the OP ..its your call i like both but deca is def the better mass builder if that is your goal....

But when its used in a bulking cycle, is it really used in PLACE of something like Deca ? That was my point. I know people use it for both bulk and cut, but they include it for some of the reasons you mention, not really for the reasons one includes Deca.

Thats what I meant about not being interchangable. IMO you use the two for different reasons, even if they are used in the same type of cycle....

**jimmyinkedup** · 01-22-2009, 08:32 AM

^^^ good point .. I personally like to see eq used if its a second or third cycle situation and user is looking to try something along with test (or decais a good choice too). I also dont like deca with anadrol - that's just me and my personal experiences. You are def right though - apples and oranges.

**Bossman** · 01-22-2009, 08:49 AM

Originally Posted by Jcoz

Doesn't do much, or not much in the way of gains?

Take your pick, its doesnt do much and not much in the way of gains.

I'm sure for it to exist for so long and be at the prices its at, it serves a few purposes.

Its just another compound. I will try it again some day at much higher doses, but Ive got to be flush with money, because you don't get much bang for the buck.

But as far as I knew Deca and EQ are not usually AAS that people are choosing between for bulk cycles, the title of the thread made me laugh a little, not trying to be a dick or anything.

The question has been asked before. You'll get many laughs if you search.

OP, the above are (obviously) correct, if you're going for bulk, EQ really isn't interchangable with something like Deca. So as long as you are OK with the suppresion, go with the Deca.

Read the profile on EQ, its not known as a mass builder.

answers in bold.