Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: The case for Blended Test vs Prop, TestE, or Test C

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    38

    The case for Blended Test vs Prop, TestE, or Test C

    I was taught most of the basics 5 years ago by a much more experianced friend, and since grown my own knowledge regarding Test. One thing I was told and just accepted was to avoid all belnded tests (omnadren, sustanon). I just never gave it a second thought, once in a while I'd read something to back that up, but for the most part skipped any threads mentioning blended tests.

    What is the case for using these blended tests? I still will stick to the ones I know, but how do these continue to be popular choices when so many advise against them?

    I did some searches trying to find an objective pros vs cons thread regarding this, but couldn't find one. If this has already been discussed (in this way) ad nauseum, feel free to just provide a link.

    It seems most of those threads have just turned into arbitrary mud slinging with general blanket statements without much substance.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    3,400
    This topic has been discussed quite a bit, particularly comparing sustanon to single esther tests. The consensus has been that to keep blood levels stable, in the amounts bb'rs dose, injection frequency would have to be EOD. I do know bros that do well injecting 2x a week, but could they do better with more frequent injections?

    I recall seeing a graph that showed blood levels when dosing sus, but I can't find the link.

    http://www.steroid.com/Sustanon-250.php

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •