Winstrol+eq after cycle

[kkelis2784]

hey guys ,


Had a long discussion with a friend the other day about a cycle he thinking about doing and we werent sure about some stuff so i decided to ask u guys here .

The cycle ideally will be 16 weeks just about ..

1-4 weeks..... anadrol sustanon
4-12 weeks .... sustanon equipoise
12-16 weeks .... winstol equipoise

on the 12th week sustanon ends and winstrol starts . Now , i know that winstrol + eq are not suppose to be taken without test because of shitty gains and no erection etc. But in this case is it different because sustanon stays in ur body for a few weeks after u stop taking it ? or is it best to just get more sustanon and conitinue sustanon till the end of the cycle ?


Thanks alot in advance peeps .

Ciao

[Hard.On]

I see how on paper this may seem like a great Idea.
But I dont think that it is.

Do you have cycle exp?

[tboney]

hey guys ,


Had a long discussion with a friend the other day about a cycle he thinking about doing and we werent sure about some stuff so i decided to ask u guys here .

The cycle ideally will be 16 weeks just about ..

1-4 weeks..... anadrol sustanon
4-12 weeks .... sustanon equipoise
12-16 weeks .... winstol equipoise

on the 12th week sustanon ends and winstrol starts . Now , i know that winstrol + eq are not suppose to be taken without test because of shitty gains and no erection etc. But in this case is it different because sustanon stays in ur body for a few weeks after u stop taking it ? or is it best to just get more sustanon and conitinue sustanon till the end of the cycle ?


Thanks alot in advance peeps .

Ciao

Very poor cycle man.
Stats?
Age?
Cycle exp.?

[daem]

Back to the drawing board! Come back with a real cycle please...

[kkelis2784]

forget stats and stuff .. it was just a discussion about a good bulking cycle (excluding winstol from it) . And my experience is minimal and far from being a pro but if i were to be thinking of a bulking cycle ... i dont see whats wrong with anadrol / sustanon 250 / equipoise cycle .......

So .."back to the drawing board" and "Very poor cycle" isnt the answer needed here . Like most people i seek opinions but more informative ones and not just plain "no" "yes" answers .. Thanks

[Gaspari1255]

EQ for only 12 weeks is pointless, imo. I'd say 16+

[c-Z]

EQ for only 12 weeks is pointless, imo. I'd say 16+

Agreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed. 100%

[MiniBeast]

home come you ave to run eq so long?

[kkelis2784]

seriously yeah....whenever there was any recomendations for eq it was always said to be around 12 to14 weeks..

[daem]

forget stats and stuff .. it was just a discussion about a good bulking cycle (excluding winstol from it) . And my experience is minimal and far from being a pro but if i were to be thinking of a bulking cycle ... i dont see whats wrong with anadrol / sustanon 250 / equipoise cycle .......

So .."back to the drawing board" and "Very poor cycle" isnt the answer needed here . Like most people i seek opinions but more informative ones and not just plain "no" "yes" answers .. Thanks

1. You asked for a critique of your "ideal" run with those compounds
2. My judgment is that you put it together in a less than ideal way
3. There is a search button up top that can help you do research on your own
4. I have no obligation to spoon feed you
5. All the information you need can be found from the past...The question you asked does not require a lengthy explanation of why it isn't great

Good luck.