Are Anthony Roberts articles reliable?

[Exilus]

Every single bit of information about steroids on steroid.com seems to be the work of Anthony Roberts. Even though he was fired and sued, the website still displays his work. is it reliable?

[c-Z]

If it wasn't would it be there? No.

[toothache]

I believe it is reliable seeing how he plagiarized most of it from real steroid gurus.

[c-Z]

If it was plagiarized i am sure there would have been a law suit and the info would no longer be there. I am sure everyone is referenced that information was taken from.

[Exilus]

I believe it is reliable seeing how he plagiarized most of it from real steroid gurus.

^^^This made me lol.

[tripmachine]

you know how teachers sometimes say... 'no question is a stupid question...' well this proves those teachers wrong! ;b

[c-Z]

you know how teachers sometimes say... 'no question is a stupid question...' well this proves those teachers wrong! ;b

^^^ THAT MADE ME LOL! AHAHAHA. Teachers were always wrong in my book.

[jordann]

Anthony Roberts info is good to go. So what if he plagarized their work? He dumbed it down to the point where any "dbol only cycle" king can comprehend it...and that's saying a lot. Funny how 95% of this board hates his guts and claim he is an unknowledgeable idiot, but use his articles to a tee.

[taiboxa]

Anthony Roberts info is good to go. So what if he plagarized their work? He dumbed it down to the point where any "dbol only cycle" king can comprehend it...and that's saying a lot. Funny how 95% of this board hates his guts and claim he is an unknowledgeable idiot, but use his articles to a tee.

LOL says the guy who knows nothing of the truth ... take a step back to 06-07 .. and you would know why so many despise him

[magic32]

1) Every single bit of information about steroids on steroid.com seems to be the work of Anthony Roberts.
2) Even though he was fired and sued, the website still displays his work. is it reliable?

This is not an "If so, Then" scenario as is painted above.

That is to say, items 1 & 2 above are unrelated, in that the former (his documented works) have little to do with the latter (the relationships he entered and exited here). The works (for the most part) are valid, reliable and regardless of origin, time-tested and often thoroughly cited/referenced.