Results 1 to 40 of 41
-
front loading with prop may not be what you think!
I keep reading were a lot of people on our board are using test prop to front load/kick start their cycles. My question is what do you feel you are accomplishing by doing so?
Please read post 955 in the following thread- http://forums.steroid.com/showthread.php?t=402776
-
05-22-2010, 08:43 PM #2
I've used plenty of each, and I certainly feel the effects of prop sooner than the effects of longer esters, so I'm not quite sure what you are saying.
-
05-22-2010, 09:00 PM #3
I can't say I agree with this
Peace
-
I use to think the same thing Big, but according to studies test enanthate actually kicks in faster. Thinking back it was probably just a placebo effect.
Testosterone propionate : Maximal testosterone levels in the supraphysiological range where seen 14 hours after injection!
Test enanthate or cypionate : Maximal range where seen "only" 10 hours after injection!
Reference from the book Testosterone Action Deficiency Substitution 2nd edition, Chapter 11 Comparative pharmacokinetics of testosterone esters page 333 and page 335.
-
-
05-22-2010, 09:25 PM #6
I did not read the study but plan to.
I do understand what you are saying with in hours your test levels are much higher with test e then test prop...
but it has been my personal experience running test e, gains come about three and a half weeks into the cycle...
With test prop the gains start kicking in, in about day nine... but to be totally honest here, I have never ran prop by itself, i have always ran mast or tren with it so I really cant say my personal experience are correct.
if this makes any since..
-
05-22-2010, 09:25 PM #7
-
05-22-2010, 09:38 PM #8
Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 2,657
Anyone who has ever run test-p vs. test-e realizes the difference that a long vs. short estered compound makes on the cycle.
Also, your studies don't take into account, whatsoever, the effects of ester weight on compounds... especially the amount of active hormone per ester...
Thoughts?
-VM
-
05-23-2010, 12:19 AM #9
test enanthate may "kick in" faster but levels dont peak until 4 weeks im assuming.
lets say your taking 500mg of test e per wk. and assume the half life is 7days to keep things simple.
week 1:500mg/2 = 250mg
week 2: 250mg+ 500mg= 750/2 = 375mg
week 3: 375mg+500mg = 875/2 = 437.5mg
week 4 :437.5mg+500mg = 937.5/2 = 486.5mg
week 5 :486.5mg+500mg = 986.5/2 = 493.25mg
but say you were to use an active dose of 500mg of prop a week at 71.42mg ED per week, your total levels wud hit 500 much faster.
anyone agree?
-
05-23-2010, 05:49 AM #10
I can feel prop in 3-4 days, but I don't feel the effect of Cyp for 3-4 weeks.
-
05-23-2010, 06:35 AM #11
Never tried prop
I heard it hurts like a S.O.B
-
In no way am I wanting to argue this topic with anyone, but rather bring forth some adult discussion as most people think prop kicks in faster than test enanthate and cypionate and that appears not to be the case.
I think the reason we all might feel test prop faster is not because it kicks in faster but because it has a higher initial peak.
-
05-23-2010, 06:39 AM #13
So how bad does it hurt doing prop?????
Never known anyone that has done it before.
Just heard that it hurts....
-
-
05-23-2010, 06:46 AM #15
-
05-23-2010, 06:50 AM #16
Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 819
The advantage of test e over prop for me is cost more than anything. Its def going to run you a little more hitting prop, but the less frequent injects are nice though. But one thing a lot of people dont realize, is 500mg/wk prop is not the same as 500mg/wk test e, the prop is much stronger mg for mg because of the half life. I think an even better front loader is suspension, actually if you can afford to go 3 wks on/3 off suspension throughout cycle its a nice addition.
-
05-23-2010, 06:50 AM #17
Ronnie, Today is day 15 of my tren A and test P cycle, and at 500mg/week of prop pinned ED, i am only JUST starting to notice gains in the gym, thats 2 weeks in. So you have a nice point.
My question is, does the fact of the matter being that test-e peaks blood-plasma conc. 4 hours earlier than test p mean that it builds test levels to peak conc. (for your dosage) faster over the 2-3 weeks than test p?
-
According to studies test enanthate peaks out at around 5 times above basal only 8- 24 hours after injection (not 4 weeks later).
On the other hand, testosterone levels go below the normal range only 2 days following an injection of test propionate .
-
-
-
I don't think it makes any difference which test you use as long as you continue using it. Whether it kicks in 4 hours earlier or 4 hours later is not whats important! Gains start after around 2-3 weeks with any form of test (not because levels are peaking after 2-3 weeks) but rather it takes some time for muscle tissue to start building!
-
05-23-2010, 07:14 AM #22
-
05-23-2010, 07:17 AM #23
Disclaimer-BG is presenting fictitious opinions and does in no way encourage nor condone the use of any illegal substances.
The information discussed is strictly for entertainment purposes only.
Everything was impossible until somebody did it!
I've got 99 problems......but my squat/dead ain't one !!
It doesnt matter how good looking she is, some where, some one is tired of her shit.
Light travels faster then sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
Great place to start researching ! http://forums.steroid.com/anabolic-s...-database.html
-
05-23-2010, 07:18 AM #24
Always love reading your posts man.... However I agree with big and rage as well... With the longer esters I feel it takes much longer to kick vs the prop. But It usually doesn't take as long as some say...
So does this mean that troll awhile back was correct? Damn I wish i still had that post. Because he said the same thing. And everyone was bashing the sh*t out of him. Yet he said its safer to stay on longer rather than keep shutting yourself down and getting it all going again.
Buttt yeahhh anyhow nice post..
-
05-23-2010, 07:20 AM #25
Thanks ronnie. Just eat, sleep, shutup and shoot.
.
And you guys are bitches, sorry, but i only run prop or suspension for test, i pin ED for 12 weeks or 18 if i do ronnies load/deload/reload cycle. Sometimes i even 2x a day with suspension.. No pain, no gain.
-
05-23-2010, 07:21 AM #26
Everyone always uses prop in the beginning. Has anyone who runs pct ever thought of actually using it at the end? PCT for long esters require much longer wait time to start PCT. Therefore you kind of drag a bit waiting for that 2 weeks or almost 3 weeks.
Would you benefit from running prop say 2 days before last long ester injection for 2-3 weeks this way your pct would start much sooner rather than having to wait those couple weeks.
-
05-23-2010, 07:24 AM #27
-
05-23-2010, 07:28 AM #28
2x a day is more then enough, it has a half life of around 8-12 hours according to most sources, however 3x would be much better.
Well being a fighter nothing helps more than that sudden test rush, and you only get that with suspension. Not to mention for every 100mg you inject you get 100mg of test.
Also AAS don't have to be injected IM, even though i mostly do. It has been shown ( if you want ill look for the studies) that there is minimal if no difference between sub-q and IM injections. So with suspension i like to do one sub-Q and one IM at 50-75mg an injection.
-
05-23-2010, 07:32 AM #29
-
05-23-2010, 07:33 AM #30
Yeah I have seen studies on sub q and IM....
But if you have a reason to run it.. Go on ahead. HAHA.... Yeah test e is what like 72mg of actual test too 100mgs right? so really if you wanted 100mgs you need to run more like 140mgs of test e to get that full 100mgs eh?
I never really worry about it. HAHA i just pick a dose and run it.
-
05-23-2010, 07:48 AM #31
-
05-23-2010, 07:55 AM #32
ok i think ronnies got a good point, heres something i found:
"Adding an ester delays the amount of time that it takes for the steroid to leave the body, although peak concentrations are realized (with both long as well as short esters) within a day or two at most."
http://www.*********.com/steroid-esters/
-
05-23-2010, 08:43 AM #33
my brother calls test e dirty because of the long ester and says he will never use it again. he complains about the bloating and simply will not listen to me when i tell him he will not retain water so much if he just takes steps to curb it with other compounds
-
05-23-2010, 09:02 AM #34
-
05-23-2010, 09:37 AM #35
A lot of things look good on paper , but when applied in real life dont stand up.
Disclaimer-BG is presenting fictitious opinions and does in no way encourage nor condone the use of any illegal substances.
The information discussed is strictly for entertainment purposes only.
Everything was impossible until somebody did it!
I've got 99 problems......but my squat/dead ain't one !!
It doesnt matter how good looking she is, some where, some one is tired of her shit.
Light travels faster then sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
Great place to start researching ! http://forums.steroid.com/anabolic-s...-database.html
-
That's a crazy idea right there about test e being dirty. He obviously does not realize it but, TEST is TEST in the end regardless of the ester and while some feel they get less bloat from prop, some feel they get more bloat, because the initial peak is higher than with enanthate .
-
-
05-24-2010, 05:56 AM #38
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- N. of the arctic circle
- Posts
- 319
Regardless of how it looks on paper or what blood testing shows, gains are made sooner with Prop then with enth/cyp.
Isnīt that all that matters.
We are not frontloading to get results out of a blood test, its for early gains and thus elongating our cycles.
Am I getting this tread all wrong or....
-
05-24-2010, 06:29 AM #39
thanks for the reply to my first post ronnie rowland. to clarify on his statements what he is saying is that the bloat sucks and he is getting less test per mg so it is therefore an inferior test. he is very hard headed somtimes. he has never even used prop. also this peak you are talking about tells me on thing. I need to do more research. I can follow from one of you post what you mean i just do not fully comprehend the concept.
Last edited by chopzall; 05-24-2010 at 06:32 AM. Reason: did not want to put up 2 post back 2 back
-
05-24-2010, 08:24 AM #40
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
So far so good, they seem to be doing what they’re supposed to.
Expired dbol (blue hearts)