Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: critique this thoughts: does steroids causes breast cancers?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    625

    critique this thoughts: does steroids causes breast cancers?

    After reading some of the profile for pct compounds like e.g. arimidex, aromasin, nolva, clomid etc, as an alternative to fight gyno, it seems then it is reasonable to infer that steroid use causes "breast cancer" because those those compounds are intended to combat breast cancer, am I correct?

    Then the next question that comes to mind then is why bother with steroids in the first place if you are going to end up with some form of cancer e.g. puffy breast.
    Last edited by SG2009; 06-13-2010 at 08:01 PM.

  2. #2
    Big's Avatar
    Big is offline Retired~ AR-Hall of Famer ~ "Enforcer"
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    28,651
    Quote Originally Posted by SG2009 View Post
    After reading some of the profile for pct compounds like e.g. arimidex, aromasin, nolva, clomid etc, as an alternative to fight gyno, it seems then it is reasonable to infer that steroids cause "breast cancer" because those those compounds are intended to combat breast cancer, am I correct?

    Then the next question is why bother to take steroids in the first place if you are likely to end with some form of cancer e.g. puffy breast.
    breast cancer in men?
    and "puffy breast" isn't breast cancer.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    625
    Big,

    I see what you mean. All advice given is for entertainment purposes only. For medical advice seek a qualified professional. Haa! haa!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    254
    Quote Originally Posted by SG2009 View Post
    After reading some of the profile for pct compounds like e.g. arimidex, aromasin, nolva, clomid etc, as an alternative to fight gyno, it seems then it is reasonable to infer that steroid use causes "breast cancer" because those those compounds are intended to combat breast cancer, am I correct?

    Then the next question that comes to mind then is why bother with steroids in the first place if you are going to end up with some form of cancer e.g. puffy breast.

    it is reasonable to infer that steroid use causes "breast cancer" because those those compounds are intended to combat breast cancer, am I correct?
    haha, Epic. Buddy read through the forums. Those meds are used to combat Breast Cancer - Yes. But in the case of steroids they are used to suppress estrogen so that your natural test levels up.

    Do your research before you type.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Somewhere
    Posts
    508
    Although extremely rare, men can develop breast cancer. And I suppose steroids could accelerate a condition of cancer, however, the chances of breast cancer in men are so tiny it is not even worth bothering about.

    More prostate and testicular cancer we have to worry about .

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    625
    Quote Originally Posted by cybernox View Post
    haha, Epic. Buddy read through the forums. Those meds are used to combat Breast Cancer - Yes. But in the case of steroids they are used to suppress estrogen so that your natural test levels up.

    Do your research before you type.


    Don't jump to conclusion cybernox, I'm still in the middle of my research, and I gotta type somewhere in the middle bro.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    625
    Quote Originally Posted by nilrac View Post
    Although extremely rare, men can develop breast cancer. And I suppose steroids could accelerate a condition of cancer, however, the chances of breast cancer in men are so tiny it is not even worth bothering about.

    More prostate and testicular cancer we have to worry about .
    I think u mde some valid points nilrac, I will look into these suppositions you mention. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    71
    If they caused cancer, every user would develop it. Cause leads us to assume a 100% risk, a definite. They may be more of a 'factor' in breast cancers in men. Factors lead us to assume a potential, but not a definite. Perhaps?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    625
    Quote Originally Posted by Devil's_Advocate View Post
    If they caused cancer, every user would develop it. Cause leads us to assume a 100% risk, a definite. They may be more of a 'factor' in breast cancers in men. Factors lead us to assume a potential, but not a definite. Perhaps?

    This is a controversial topic. Thanks for your remarks.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •