Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Time on = Time off cycle

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Tampa Bay
    Posts
    179

    Time on = Time off cycle

    What are your opinions on how often you can cycle? I have heard that the time spent on cycle should = the time you spend off cycle. Whatcha think?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    R.I.P My friends
    Posts
    15,015
    Easiest and most surefire way to determine time to get back on cycle is with bloodwork.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Omnipresent
    Posts
    6,315
    Add PCT, i.e. TIME OFF = TIME ON + PCT

    Legend has it that this Rule of Thumb came about due to the above bloodwork recommendation. Apparently, Old School bb’ers would get bloodwork done, but sought a reliable way around it. They then accurately theorized that there was a direct correlation between cycle duration and positive lab/bloodwork. After testing various formulas, the above one worked and promptly became embedded in bb’er lore.
    Master Pai Mei of the White Lotus Clan



    My motto: SAFETY & RESPECT (for drugs and others).

    I AM NOT A SOURCE, I DO NOT GIVE OUT SOURCES, OR PROVIDE SOURCE CHECKS.
    I DO NOT SUPPORT ANY UGL's OR ANY ORGANIZATION DEALING WITH THE DISTRIBUTION OF ILLEGAL NARCOTICS/SUBSTANCES!


    Difference between Drugs & Poisons
    http://forums.steroid.com/showthread.php?t=317700


    Half-lives explained
    http://forums.steroid.com/showthread...inal+half+life


    DNP like Chemotherapy, can be a useful poison, but both are still POISONS
    http://forums.steroid.com/showthread.php?t=306144


    BE CAREFUL!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    5,750
    Quote Originally Posted by magic32 View Post
    Add PCT, i.e. TIME OFF = TIME ON + PCT

    Legend has it that this Rule of Thumb came about due to the above bloodwork recommendation. Apparently, Old School bb’ers would get bloodwork done, but sought a reliable way around it. They then accurately theorized that there was a direct correlation between cycle duration and positive lab/bloodwork. After testing various formulas, the above one worked and promptly became embedded in bb’er lore.
    i feel like i was sitting around a camp fire when you were saying this ha.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by magic32 View Post
    Add PCT, i.e. TIME OFF = TIME ON + PCT

    Legend has it that this Rule of Thumb came about due to the above bloodwork recommendation. Apparently, Old School bb’ers would get bloodwork done, but sought a reliable way around it. They then accurately theorized that there was a direct correlation between cycle duration and positive lab/bloodwork. After testing various formulas, the above one worked and promptly became embedded in bb’er lore.
    Perfect. Well said.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Tampa Bay
    Posts
    179
    If I were to get blood work done to determin if my body has begun to produce natural test, would that be enough to safely start another cycle?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    illinois
    Posts
    432
    4 months on and 2 months(or 10 weeks) off is pretty common place for me.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •