Results 1 to 15 of 15
Thread: Test Prop?
-
10-05-2010, 09:42 AM #1Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Posts
- 164
Test Prop?
Will you lose a lot of mass once you finish an 8 week cycle of test prop?
Anyone have any results?
Anyone have any experience with prop?
-
-
10-05-2010, 10:14 AM #3Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Posts
- 164
What do you think a solid PCT would be?
-
10-05-2010, 10:16 AM #4
If you cannot throw together a PCT for an 8 week test prop cycle, maybe you need to reconsider cycling... Not trying to be a d1ck but this is something you should know...
-
10-05-2010, 10:39 AM #5
-
10-05-2010, 11:25 AM #6
Why is it not considered a good ester for novices? Apart from having to inject every day I mean.
-
10-05-2010, 11:46 AM #7
It's very potent. The more potent the compound, the more sides are generally accompanied with it. This is why Finaplix has a reputation of being one of harshest compounds out, right next to Suspension.
-
10-05-2010, 02:20 PM #8Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Posts
- 164
-
10-05-2010, 02:21 PM #9Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Posts
- 164
-
10-05-2010, 05:44 PM #10
-
10-06-2010, 12:13 AM #11
I have to respectfully disagree. The only thing about it that makes it bad for novices is that you need to inject every day. I see no reason why enanthate is better than prop for novices other than the fact you inject only twice per week. I ran it as my first injectable cycle and loved the results and felt great on it. I will never run a long esther ever due to the fact I don't get bloated on it and I get much faster results. As far as sides go, it is only individual as I have heard of people having more sides with enanthate due to the prop esther half-life being shorter. I will say I didn't have any sides over than minor shoulder/upper chest acne and it was very mild
-
10-06-2010, 03:03 AM #12
In my research of test it is the ester that decides how potent a compound is. ie the longer the ester the weaker the compound or conversly the shorter the ester the more test(mg) there is per ml.
So as result i will be doing less mg's of prop per week than i would on Test E.
-
-
10-06-2010, 05:28 AM #14Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- Paradise By The Dashboard
- Posts
- 759
Maybe it's just my source, but my prop is literally crippeling unless I cut it and STILL....damn...
-
10-06-2010, 08:13 AM #15
I've seen many people have more adverse reactions to more potent versions of Test. Acetate, Propionate , and Suspension would fall in these categories. Just because you had a successful cycle, doesn't mean the next person will. Bloat can be accompanied with any form of Test, and it can be remedied just as easily.
However I did not say that everyone that is thinking of cycling shouldn't run Prop, I was implying something I've seen with my experience with AAS over the past several years.
I've seen some pretty awful cycles work very well with people in my day. Now just because they got away with zero negative side effects, doesn't mean I should condone the use of it to the next person. It's been suggested that Test E or C should be utilized for novices for a long time now, and there are good reasons behind this type of logic, more than just the frequency of injections..
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
cutting/ fat loss advice needed...
04-16-2024, 01:34 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS