ICN question

**Tom** · 03-05-2003, 02:36 PM

I hear that ther have been rumors of fake ICN's and also a rumor that Galenka is not making ICN's anyomore. My question is I just got some today and wanted to check the numbers on them the numbers are 3507 1002 1007 I took the pic from the pictures forum mine are the exact ones in the bottom pic

**Tom** · 03-05-2003, 03:55 PM

any one?

**jleighty17** · 03-05-2003, 07:07 PM

i dont know if i belive fake ICN's are around #1 they are cheap so why fake them and #2 there is no proof one guy called a yugo source on this and it spread like wild fire. now i know WW and he is a damn good bro but i still need proof before i call someone a scammer from sending fakes.
and those are both fine they changed the logo and stuff a while back they are both still floating around.
JLI

**Tom** · 03-05-2003, 07:54 PM

I know exactly what your talking about but these didnt come from the yugo that WW went through. I d like to see what will come of that

**dude** · 03-06-2003, 12:30 PM

I am currently using the ones on the bottem with the new logo. I am using them alone and let me tell you- They are 110% Real. Signs of gyno within 2-3 weeks, strength up, little acne, etc... All is good Bro.

**Jack87** · 03-07-2003, 06:01 PM

Icn's in both pics are 100% legit bro... I have used both the new and old amps and yours are legit enjoy...

**georgie24** · 03-08-2003, 10:19 AM

my icn's are prettier!!lol enjoy

**Pump'n'Pose** · 10-14-2003, 09:23 PM

they are not fake. they change the labels from time to time!

**johnsomebody** · 10-14-2003, 10:34 PM

I've got the same stuff, same numbers and have heard mixed reviews on that batch. Not using it yet myself.

**johnsomebody** · 10-16-2003, 05:16 PM

Oh great, here's a quote from an earlier thread...

"The reason why Galenika stoped production in March this year was because they didn`t have all components to make it.So this new batches are 99% good as the older ones.Only seria that was underdosed was #3507
DOC "
http://anabolicreview.com/vbulletin/...&highlight=ICN

That's not what I heard before.

Bump for more input!