Help Deciding on SD Bridge

**NateSVT** · 02-21-2011, 01:21 AM

I am about to start my 4th cycle and have decided to bridge SD and M-LMG. I'm having a hard time deciding which is the best way to do this.

I like the first option because I will get good gains from SD and have 4 weeks after to help maintain and possibly add onto my gains. I am worried about this one though because many people recommend to go straight into PCT after SD because of how harsh it is. I'm worried I could possibly get some gyno in the middle of the M-LMG part of it and have to start PCT early.

The second option is nice because PCT will be immediately after SD, but the gains might be harder to keep.

1.
SD..... 20/20/20/00 /00 /00 /00
M-LMG.. 00/00/75/100/100/100/100

2.
M-LMG.. 75/100/100/100/100/00/00
SD..... 00/00 /00 /00 /20 /20/20

What do you guys think is the safer option?

**marcus300** · 02-21-2011, 02:13 AM

What are your stats?
what are your previous cycles?
Using to orals for a birdge isnt a wise thing to do, it will kill your liver and appetite and will defeat your goals.
Usually bridging means to bridge to another cycle,

What is your cycle you are finishing? I think a better option would be go into pct and recovery and then plan for the next cycle.

**NateSVT** · 02-21-2011, 02:41 AM

23 years old. 5' 10" 200lbs at around 10%bf.

My previous cycles were Hdrol, SD, and Alpha One.

I am not currently in a cycle, my last one was Alpha One in August of last year.

**marcus300** · 02-21-2011, 02:44 AM

Originally Posted by NateSVT

23 years old. 5' 10" 200lbs at around 10%bf.

My previous cycles were Hdrol, SD, and Alpha One.

I am not currently in a cycle, my last one was Alpha One in August of last year.

So if you not in a current cycle what are you bridging from and to?

I think you need to address your knowledge further before going down this route.

**NateSVT** · 02-21-2011, 03:00 AM

Well I guess the other forum I'm on is the only one that considers it a bridge. Just read this,

Pretty sure a cycle consisting of two steroids ran sequentially with an overlap is only called a "bridge" on this forum. Anywhere else a "bridge" describes low-dosed AAS use between cycles (hence, "bridging" from one real cycle to another). Semantics don't really matter, though, we know what you're talking about.

Anyways no I'm not in a cycle now and am not doing a real bridge. I just want to know which is the better way to run the two orals that I mentioned in the first post.

**marcus300** · 02-21-2011, 03:04 AM

Seeing that your forum is the only forum what says that I would say your forum is wrong, its not a bridge.

Neither cycle is good, you shouldnt be running two orals together and you should read the education threads on how to design cycles.

**BIG NICE** · 02-21-2011, 03:37 PM

Did you keep any size gains after your previous oral cycles. I ran 3 lifetime of Mdrol, none of which really produced lasting gains in size. Strength did go up, but that wasn't really my focus. After this experience, I'll never do orals, or at least orals by themselves.