As per a few other discussions I've had on this board, I've determined that my cycle goals (it'll be my first) will best be attained if I pare a little bodyfat prior to getting the cycle underway. I am currently not that high (i'll have it measured tomorrow so I have numbers to go by), but most traces of abs have dissipated and a good chunk of the muscle separation seems to be fading...in short, muscle and fat seem to be coming on lately at a roughly 1.5:1 ratio, in "favor" of the fat. As such, I'm tentatively planning on running liquaclen for the next six weeks up until the cycle begins.
My question regarding this (actually, there are two) is if there is some dogmatic principle i'm overlooking here. Is there anything that clen might do, any effects, any metabolic pathways it might disrupt, interfere with, etc, etc that can any way hinder a cycle when undertaken directly before the cycle begins? I can't realistically envision one, but I do want to be safe here. The only possibility I can come up with is that, given my cycle will be kicked off with d-bol, might a six week run of liquaclen followed immediately by d-bol be a little too much with regards to blood pressure?
Secondly, I've had a number of people suggest liquathy in conjunction with the liquaclen. However, given my metabolism is fairly rapid (my problems in dieting down usually stem not from fat loss issues but muscle preservation issues) might that be an overkill? I'm not looking to be in contest shape or anything like that, just planning to take off some of the excess fat that came towards the end of bulking...and i'm thinking liquathy might be too much in that regard.