-
04-03-2011, 02:22 PM #1
Pros and cons verses cycle length?
Been trying to find some answers on the pros and cons verses cycle length. I was going to run a short 8 week blast cycle (just started TRT, 100 mg biweekly) to see how my body reacts (300mg every 3 days). Tonight will be my 4th pin and I havent noticed anything yet. Maybe 8 weeks will be too short to see a big enough difference. What is the harm in running longer than 12 weeks? Will there be more gains in longer cycles?
-
04-03-2011, 02:25 PM #2
You have to run shorter acting esters steroids when running shorter cycles to maximize gains, things like test prop, mast prop, tren ace, anavar , winni, npp the list goes on. The idea is your body is not shut down as long and you are still getting the same results as you would being shutdown about a month less. I am a huge fan of these cycles. You can maximize them by Priming before. Marcus300 has a thread going about this that is very informative.
-
04-04-2011, 02:14 AM #3
-
04-04-2011, 03:22 AM #4
Eth takes 4 to 5 weeks to really kickin.Ronnie Roland has a sticky you should read.You can use Eth.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
SVT and steroids?
Yesterday, 09:28 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS