Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    stugots is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    10

    Shooting GH intramuscular VS Sub Q?

    Which is better with your experience? Does anyone notice local fat burning if shooting subq in the stomach area?

  2. #2
    Times Roman's Avatar
    Times Roman is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Back from Afghanistan
    Posts
    27,383
    GH burns where you pin it

    SubQ is the standard practice

  3. #3
    Hazard's Avatar
    Hazard is offline AR-Elite Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    20,514
    Here's what I think I know..... lol

    Most common protocol is sub Q as TR has stated..... The absorbtion rate is slower than IM but also higher. I can't remember where I read it but when you shoot IM the GH will get into the blood stream quicker but you'll absorb less of it.

    Whether I have that right or not..... theres not much of a reason to go IM. No need for added scar tissue.....

    ~Haz~
    Failure is not and option..... ONLY beyond failure is - Haz

    Think beyond yourselves and remember this forum is for educated members to help advise SAFE usage of AAS, not just tell you what you want to hear
    - Knockout_Power

    NOT DOING SOURCE CHECKS......


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •