-
04-19-2011, 09:50 PM #1
Which would give you more keepable lean mass: 600 EQ /wk or 400 deca /wk?
Title, for the same length of time of course.
-
04-19-2011, 09:57 PM #2Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Mississippi
- Posts
- 580
my opinion,the EQ would,imo.but i like deca better,it causes water bloat,but can be controlled,but with both,you havt to keep your diet right after you cycle with either,also the EQ willgive you a more hardeness of your muscles and deca wont
-
04-19-2011, 10:03 PM #3
EQ just makes you hungrier but is by far the weakest steroid I have ever tried.
-
04-19-2011, 10:06 PM #4Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Mississippi
- Posts
- 580
-
04-19-2011, 10:09 PM #5Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- northwest
- Posts
- 561
I like eq personally for quality lean muscle but yes you wont gain near as much
-
04-20-2011, 09:07 AM #6
-
04-20-2011, 09:14 AM #7
I would rather inject cat piss over EQ and your would probably get more mass gains from it
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
SVT and steroids?
Yesterday, 09:28 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS