Enanthate vs. Cyponate

**HALTEH** · 07-02-2011, 03:21 PM

What's the real difference between the two? I know theyre both long acting, and good for beginner cycles. But what would be a deciding factor to choose one over the other?

I've done one cycle with Enanthate , and was thinking on trying Cyp for my next (just for the hell of it)

Any thoughts?

**Bonaparte** · 07-02-2011, 03:24 PM

A google search could have answered this. It's just personal preference over a few small details (mainly availability, desired concentration, etc)

**gixxerboy1** · 07-02-2011, 03:26 PM

price decides the 2 for me

**layeazy** · 07-02-2011, 03:34 PM

another stupid vs thread and you spelt cypionate wrong..

Do some research..............

**weightlifter79** · 07-03-2011, 01:49 AM

There about the same

**Times Roman** · 07-03-2011, 06:11 AM

Originally Posted by gixxerboy1

price decides the 2 for me

Agree

**legacy_67** · 07-03-2011, 03:36 PM

Originally Posted by gixxerboy1

price decides the 2 for me

which is cheaper? Im looking at test E for my first cycle.

**gixxerboy1** · 07-03-2011, 09:58 PM

Originally Posted by legacy_67

which is cheaper? Im looking at test E for my first cycle.

depends on your source. That why i said price decided. I get what ever is cheaper at the time.

**jayvio** · 07-04-2011, 01:36 AM

ha ha.. u spelled spelt wrong.....

**HALTEH** · 07-04-2011, 08:45 AM

Originally Posted by layeazy

another stupid vs thread and you spelt cypionate wrong..

Do some research..............

Just a typo, big boy. Take it easy..................

**Ashop** · 07-04-2011, 09:18 AM

They act almost identical. You cant go wrong with either.

**Far from massive** · 07-04-2011, 09:49 AM

Cyp (I ainte gunna spelt it rong) is more bedder than Enan because it.

(A) Keeps longer
(B) Does not have problems with crappy powder impurities causing burning in the final product
(C) Is more freakin American

**gixxerboy1** · 07-04-2011, 10:05 AM

its more bedder huh

**irongod** · 07-04-2011, 10:07 AM

pretty much the same, however my friend who did a cycle of both said enanthate kicks ass

**Shol'va** · 07-04-2011, 10:40 AM

If memory serves, the Enanthate has one less carbon atom and lasts ever so slightly longer than Cypionate . We are talking hours longer. You will never notice the difference. So it boils down to price. Even the Endo's will tell you as they will offer either one to their patients for TRT as they both work equally well.

Correction: when talking about the above I'm talking pharmacy grade stuff. Now when it comes to underground labs however, then all bets are off as there are way too many variations involved in who is making it and how it is being mixed, dosing, strength, etc.....I've got a feeling that this is where the controversy comes in on the two. Someone will get a bottle of UGL test-c and it will be dosed way higher than it is labeled and who ever is using it will think man this stuff is powerful and blows test-e away. Or the other way around. this is one of the problems with inconsistent ugl labs. You never know for sure the quality or dosage. we are at their mercy. Probably happens more than one thinks.

**higgy** · 07-04-2011, 11:17 AM

[QUOTE=Far from massive;5685616]Cyp (I ainte gunna spelt it rong) is more bedder than Enan because it.

(A) Keeps longer
(B) Does not have problems with crappy powder impurities causing burning in the final product
(C) Is more freakin American[/QUOTE]

Happy 4th of July cypionate ...u American made super steroid !

**Times Roman** · 07-05-2011, 02:29 AM

Originally Posted by Shol'va

If memory serves, the Enanthate has one less carbon atom and lasts ever so slightly longer than Cypionate. We are talking hours longer. You will never notice the difference. So it boils down to price. Even the Endo's will tell you as they will offer either one to their patients for TRT as they both work equally well.

Correction: when talking about the above I'm talking pharmacy grade stuff. Now when it comes to underground labs however, then all bets are off as there are way too many variations involved in who is making it and how it is being mixed, dosing, strength, etc.....I've got a feeling that this is where the controversy comes in on the two. Someone will get a bottle of UGL test-c and it will be dosed way higher than it is labeled and who ever is using it will think man this stuff is powerful and blows test-e away. Or the other way around. this is one of the problems with inconsistent ugl labs. You never know for sure the quality or dosage. we are at their mercy. Probably happens more than one thinks.

isn't it the other way around? enth has a little bit shorter active life than cyp?