Dumb question...Test Prop...

**Indymuscleguy** · 07-27-2011, 05:23 PM

Ok group here's the dumb question of the day...

Why is it that short eststers like Prop work better for me than the longer esters such as cyp or ethanate? My body really responds well and fast.

Thanks!

**Lemonada8** · 07-27-2011, 05:48 PM

Here fishy fishy fishy

and i love short esters, thats all i will ever use

**songdog** · 07-27-2011, 09:44 PM

My source has plenty for me

**cb714** · 07-27-2011, 11:43 PM

Prop is just as easy to get as C or E.

You're asking to get scammed with that comment though.

**Bonaparte** · 07-28-2011, 12:32 AM

Last I checked, there were no prop shortages or anything.

**Times Roman** · 07-28-2011, 01:08 AM

receptors are more sensitive at the beginning of a cyle than at the end. prop allows your blood serum levels to "saturate out" very early on in the cycle, when your receptors are most sensitive.

this is probably more normal than you think

**Indymuscleguy** · 07-29-2011, 03:26 PM

With regard to Receptor saturation, is that recoverable or as you do more and more cycles, you need to increase your dose? My last two test cyp cycles went no where, unlike prop, I put on lean muscle and dropped fat. I know the longer esters will have a higher degree of fluid retention, that's why I don't go the Sus/Deca route. By far, Prop/Masteron cycles have been the best! Not only did I see an obvious difference but mentally, the 'lights burned a little brighter'...

**gixxerboy1** · 07-29-2011, 03:29 PM

it your first post. there is no fishing.

**Indymuscleguy** · 07-29-2011, 03:36 PM

Guess it did appear so...wasn't doing it on purpose...sorry 'bout the broken rule gizzerboy1

**Bonaparte** · 07-29-2011, 04:29 PM

Originally Posted by Times Roman

receptors are more sensitive at the beginning of a cyle than at the end. prop allows your blood serum levels to "saturate out" very early on in the cycle, when your receptors are most sensitive.

this is probably more normal than you think

I'm sorry, but that post was complete outdated broscience.
Receptors do not downgrade from androgen use. There are other factors involved.

**Bonaparte** · 07-29-2011, 04:30 PM

Originally Posted by Indymuscleguy

Guess it did appear so...wasn't doing it on purpose...sorry 'bout the broken rule gizzerboy1

Wow...that was a pretty unfortunate "typo" there.

**nobloat** · 07-29-2011, 04:56 PM

I dont get the fishy fishy comment . Am I missing smething

**Lemonada8** · 07-30-2011, 07:33 AM

Originally Posted by Bonaparte

I'm sorry, but that post was complete outdated broscience.
Receptors do not downgrade from androgen use. There are other factors involved.

I dont see where you got the downgrade from androgen use in that post? IMO that post was just hitting on the fast acting/short life of prop vs enth. ??