Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Soviet-Strength's Avatar
    Soviet-Strength is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lil ODESSA NY
    Posts
    54

    primobolan or parabolan?

    whats up guys?? i been super busy, been a member of this board for years now. got alot of great info from dudes on here... my question is, im currently at 6ft 4 198 lbs 14% bf. ive cycled for a few years and most recently (5 months ago) came off a masteron /tren ace cycle. im lookin for yet another cut cycle... i already have some var on hand. a reliable source of mine is offering either primo or parabolan at a good price. question is which one would u guys recommend to go along with var??? primo or para? both are dosed at 100/mg's per vial... opinions/ experience very welcomed. thanks

  2. #2
    powerliftmike's Avatar
    powerliftmike is offline ~Elite AR-Hall of Famer~
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    gates of hell
    Posts
    5,718
    how did you respond to tren a? Primo and var are DHT based. Para would be 19nor and would combine better with var, but it really comes down to goals and preferences.

  3. #3
    Soviet-Strength's Avatar
    Soviet-Strength is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lil ODESSA NY
    Posts
    54
    Quote Originally Posted by powerliftmike View Post
    how did you respond to tren a? Primo and var are DHT based. Para would be 19nor and would combine better with var, but it really comes down to goals and preferences.
    i ran the tren a at 300mg's a week for 8. pretty good results shed alot of fat, hardly any sides expect "tren cough" for bout a week. im lookin to gain alil more lbm (lean body mass), shed some more b/f. diets always in check year round pretty much especially "on cycle".

  4. #4
    songdog's Avatar
    songdog is offline ARs TOP DOG ~ MONITOR ~
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    13,686
    age?

  5. #5
    Bonaparte's Avatar
    Bonaparte is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    13,506
    If you don't mind the Tren sides, just go with that. Though I love Primo and find that it is just as versatile as Tren, it is usually twice as costly and needs to be run MUCH higher for good results.
    But the upside to Primo is that you get very few side effects (if any noticeable ones) and none of the aggression or psychological issues that often accompany Tren, but with a solid recomp effect at high doses (600+ mg/week).

  6. #6
    Soviet-Strength's Avatar
    Soviet-Strength is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lil ODESSA NY
    Posts
    54
    Quote Originally Posted by Bonaparte View Post
    If you don't mind the Tren sides, just go with that. Though I love Primo and find that it is just as versatile as Tren, it is usually twice as costly and needs to be run MUCH higher for good results.
    But the upside to Primo is that you get very few side effects (if any noticeable ones) and none of the aggression or psychological issues that often accompany Tren, but with a solid recomp effect at high doses (600+ mg/week).
    good info thanks alot. im really interested in primo, about how long should it be run for general range?

  7. #7
    Bonaparte's Avatar
    Bonaparte is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    13,506
    Quote Originally Posted by Soviet-Strength View Post
    good info thanks alot. im really interested in primo, about how long should it be run for general range?

    Well, its an enanthate ester, so 12+ weeks is good.
    It is not very androgenic , so the effects come on a bit slower than Test E.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •