Tren/test or Test only?

**stephenschmidt1** · 06-22-2012, 11:32 AM

Alright this is just a discussion and I'm not speaking for me, but more on the lines just want to hear opinions.

The general census is that you can recover faster from a test only cycle compared to a test/Tren cycle. But if someone is dead set on a body that they want and will continue to use aas until they reach that goal would it be better to go ahead and use test/Tren and accomplish the goals with fewer cycles? Or is it still safer to use only test even if it take 8 cycles of it to get here you want?

I Know there is no way of knowing how many cycles one can do before they are able to recover and stuck doing TRT, but what's the range? I'm curious just from what you have been through. So second question is from your person experience how many cycles have you done and are you still able to recover? How much longer does it take compared to your first cycle?

Thanks

**gixxerboy1** · 06-22-2012, 11:41 AM

you can only grow so fast even with steroids . You body has to adapt to carrying around extra weight. So no need to start off with tren and try and do it with a big bang

**< <Samson> >** · 06-22-2012, 11:43 AM

Originally Posted by gixxerboy1

So need to start off with tren and try and do it with a big bang

You mean no need I am pretty sure.

**gixxerboy1** · 06-22-2012, 11:48 AM

Originally Posted by samson_420

You mean no need I am pretty sure.

whoops. thanks

**stephenschmidt1** · 06-22-2012, 11:50 AM

Yeah I kinda understand that one test/Tren cycle won't give you the perfect body, but there's gotta be a ratio you would think?
Like maybe 2:1? From the way people talk about Tren it sounds like it gives you better gains. So if it takes half as many cycles of test/Tren to achieve what test alone would do, is it worth it in your opinion?

Also everyone always wants to know the OPs stats...but I'm not asking for advice just want knowledge. So if you don't mind, if you post leave your stats and cycle history.