Cyp/Tren/EQ + proviron

[El Corvino]

Was thinking 1000 mg cyp for the first 3 weeks to front load then 9 weeks @ 500 mg. Tren Ace @ 300 mg/wk q 12 weeks. EQ @ 600 mg/wk q 12 weeks. 100 mg of proviron ed for duration.

Have some winny tabs sitting around, maybe last 6 weeks. Pretty much set on it, just trolling for comments.

[austinite]

What are your full stats? First thing I'd do is lose the EQ.

[MuscleInk]

No offense....but if you're set on the cycle, why solicit comments? You have to know some people will disagree with the cycle design. Do you want helpful insight or affirmation?

EQ? Worthless IMO.

[El Corvino]

26... 6th go around. 5'11 225 @ 13%. Dieting clean now to hit 11% before starting.

What is wrong with 300 mg of Equipoise a week for 12 weeks?

[El Corvino]

Do you want helpful insight or affirmation?

EQ? Worthless IMO.

Helpful insight. Set on it unless someone on here gives me a reason to change my mind. Posting something along the lines of, if I came on here saying I was going to run the Arnold Dbol cycle, someone could tell me that since the 1970's, it has been proven that is a pretty bad idea. Not just a "it didn't work for me, there for it won't work for anyone" type deal.

[austinite]

EQ increases RBC levels to unnecessary levels. minimal gains and for most, it just makes them hungry. Too many other compounds to choose from before going with EQ. And you said in your OP 600mg, not 300. Either way, a waste.

Is this your first time running Tren?

[El Corvino]

2nd time using tren.

600 mg/wk of EQ was corrent - 300 was a typo.

"EQ increases RBC levels to unnecessary levels. minimal gains and for most, it just makes them hungry." This was the type of feedback that would actually change my mind. If you would change it for another compound, what would it be?

[austinite]

2nd time using tren.

600 mg/wk of EQ was corrent - 300 was a typo.

"EQ increases RBC levels to unnecessary levels. minimal gains and for most, it just makes them hungry." This was the type of feedback that would actually change my mind. If you would change it for another compound, what would it be?

Var. But not if you're planning on using the winny. 2 orals dont make a right.

[El Corvino]

eh... I use var as a bridge. I don't want to continuously run it and have my body get used to it.

[austinite]

You don't have to have a 3rd compound. Test and Tren will yield great results if you know how to eat.

[MuscleInk]

2nd time using tren.

600 mg/wk of EQ was corrent - 300 was a typo.

"EQ increases RBC levels to unnecessary levels. minimal gains and for most, it just makes them hungry." This was the type of feedback that would actually change my mind. If you would change it for another compound, what would it be?

I agree with Austinite (I'd be a bigger fool to disagree with that brainiac!!!). The androgenic ratio of EQ is only about 1.3 (versus tren which is around 500 I believe). The risk:benefit trade off of EQ just isn't promising enough and since most anabolics are going to jack up your cholesterol and bp, why stack a compound whose risks outweigh any conceivable benefit(s)?

I'm a proponent of primo. Most guys say you need to run it at 600mg/wk to see any benefit. I've had lean modest results at 300. Nothing crazy. 450/wk seems to be a better dose. I've never run it at 600 (yet) but based on the brain trust of this forum, it seems that is an ideal dose for substantial results.

[songdog]

I agree with them Eq isnt worth the trouble.