Results 1 to 20 of 20
Thread: Peptides as an Alternative?
-
10-20-2012, 06:15 PM #1Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Montana
- Posts
- 318
Peptides as an Alternative?
Would peptides be a good alternatives for advanced younger lifters looking for an edge? Peptides such as ghrp, grf, igf, and GH fragments, do not affect the HPTA which is the primary concern of younger guys starting AAS.
It seems like a cycle of Ipamorelin and mod-grf with igf1-lr3 taken post-workout would give great results as opposed to staying natty. Why is a cycle like this not standardly recommended for younger lifters who are set on using some type of chemical enhancement?Last edited by SportbikerKid; 10-20-2012 at 06:19 PM.
-
10-20-2012, 06:49 PM #2
Even these type of alternative have their drawbacks and can impact natural function. My best advice is going to still be diet making sure your getting the proper macros to grow. It's not going to happen if your doing pizza, fast food etc. Good basics like protein and creatine are essential to build muscle.
-
10-20-2012, 06:59 PM #3
peps will be slower to provide benefit, yet those benefits will be retained much longer.
the cost per benefit relative to aas will be much higher. much lower than hgh, though.
if you are looking for a secretague to stimulate the pituatary to release gh, oral secretagues might be a good first step, such as
arginine
gaba
(glutamine)
i put brackets around the glutamine since i feel the efffects are fairly week
-
10-20-2012, 08:05 PM #4Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Montana
- Posts
- 318
@fit. I am definitley unaware that peptides can "impact natural function." I'm not exactly sure what that means, so i guess i'll have to do a little more research haha. I also realize that diet is essential, and am trying to gear this discussion towards advanced lifters who have already had diet in check for years.
@Roman. I always thought l-arganine and gaba were BS supps; however since you endorse them, i might have to give them a try. Since I believe you're one of the most knowlegable members on the forum, it would be awesome if you could answer a few peptide-related questions for me:
-the goal of ghrp, ipamorelin, cjc is obviously to stimulate growth hormone production. Since GH is already fairly high in us younger guys, would these peptides have less of an effect on us?
-also is there any reason to cycle ipamorelin and cjc? It seems to me like you would be fine just staying on indefinitely
Thanks much!
-
10-20-2012, 09:13 PM #5
there is an interesting, but unfortunate observation with oral secretagues such as arginine and gaba. GH production, just like testosterone production, tapers off as we age. But the body responds better to ORAL secretagues the younger you are. Conversly, as you age, oral secretagues become LESS effective. So much so, that by the time you are in your mid 40's, not much additional GH release can be had by squeezing the pituatary with orals.
Yes. Your body is producing substantial amounts of GH as a youngster. However, you are confusing exogeneous GH administration with additional indogeneous GH release. When you pin exogeneous GH, my understanding is that for a very short while, your body will halt additional GH release. But when you take a secretague, my understanding is this is not the case. So with indogeneous production (by taking a secretague), you get the benefit of the GH you ordinarily would have had, PLUS the additional amount you get from stimulating the pituatary by taking a secretague.
this is the same scenerio with taking ghrp and related class of peps. since these are ultimately secretagues, you get this layered effect of the amount you ordinarily would have released, plus the additional amount coaxed out of the pituatary by the ghrp.
With the ghrp/cjc combo, you can effectively get the equivalent of about 4 to 5 iu's a day of exegenous GH. Additionally, although i have never heard of any need to cycle the ghrp class of peps, I would still take a break every once in a while. Considering the minimum course should be 6 months, it might be advisableto take a one month break after 6 months on.
IMO, the best oral secretagues are as follows in descending order of significance:
Arginine
GABA
(glutamine)
Let me know if this answers your question?
-
10-20-2012, 09:17 PM #6
btw. you are 24 and are g2g with taking any peps!
-
10-20-2012, 10:22 PM #7Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Montana
- Posts
- 318
My age shows up as 24?! Last time I checked people were saying it showed up as 18... I think something's glitched. I'm actually 20.
Great info man! Surprisingly, I've been having trouble finding solid information on cycle lengths and I think you got that question straightened out. I believe i saw you were running a peptide log a while ago, so i might have to go check that out now haha.
Thx for taking so much time to type all that up, I really can't tell you how much this has helped!
-
10-20-2012, 11:09 PM #8Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- San Diego
- Posts
- 1,196
-
10-21-2012, 02:12 PM #9
-
10-21-2012, 10:39 PM #10Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Montana
- Posts
- 318
Well a research site was having a huge sale, so I'm now stocked up on 30mg of each and ready to try this out! I'm pretty stoked because the ghrp was about 1/8 the price that ar-r charges for it. The cjc was about 1/3.
Also, I'm guessing the 18-25 year old section was a bust? I was looking forward to posting frequently in there.
-
10-21-2012, 11:20 PM #11
-
10-21-2012, 11:27 PM #12Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- San Diego
- Posts
- 1,196
-
10-21-2012, 11:28 PM #13
Aren't you the kid that has zero cycle experience yet tells people that "you know for a fact their gear is underdosed" ?
-
10-21-2012, 11:29 PM #14Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Montana
- Posts
- 318
-
10-21-2012, 11:29 PM #15Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Montana
- Posts
- 318
-
10-21-2012, 11:30 PM #16
-
10-21-2012, 11:32 PM #17
Overall Im assuming hgh is still a better way to go correct times?
Ive sorta been looking at peptides more, but I keep thinking hgh is still the way to go.
-
10-21-2012, 11:35 PM #18Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Montana
- Posts
- 318
well here's a rough comparison. I found similar data on 2 other websites so I assume this graph is nearly correct
-
10-22-2012, 12:25 PM #19
in an ideal situation, I would prefer peptides. You can show me all the graphs and charts, but if everything being equal, the GH that I make internally is preferable to exogenous GH. I'm not convinced that the peps live up to all the hype though. In my mind, the jury is still out on that one.
Please understand I have never taken GH yet. Concerns of bogus and cost are primarily why.
I have my stop watch syncronized to the atomic clock in Geneva Switzerland. =)
j/k - actually, the timing is fairly forgiving, and if you pin as i described, you will be fine.
Peptides are cheaper. For the most part, they will always be cheaper than GH
-
10-22-2012, 12:35 PM #20
Thanks times. Intersting because ghrp seems interesting. As cost and finding real hgh is always a issue.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS