The Over Analyzing Nattabolic
Been hearing about it from some friends on Trt they only have done sub-q injections the whole time and are getting all the same benefits as IM. Also read some info from a doc online who is pro Sub-q injections.
whats your personal thoughts? and have you ever tried it?
Banned
I never saw the point in this. IMO(and not saying you personally) some people try to go this route cause they're afraid of injecting. I think every bottle of AAS clearly states "for intramuscular injection."
Senior Member
Search Sub-q and you'll find plenty of info. Think there is a great thread in the HRT section.
VET
I've done both with Test Prop/E injections. I prefer IM. If subQ works for you, go for it. It really doesn't matter if the results are the same.
Knowledgeable Member
For lower dose TRT subq is probably ok. But for cycle quantities of 1 - 3 ml or more definitely IM. I wouldn't want a 3 ml pocket of oil making a lump just under the skin.
Knowledgeable Member
I've done some reading on this and from what I remember the absorption is much slower. IM is a much better option, and with a trt dose it's not like your pinning much. I just don't see the point in pinning gear sub q.
Associate Member
Its okay. I tried both and my levels were slightly better on IM for TRT. But I'd personally think anyone who does sub-q with ugl gear is an idiot and is looking for some infections or at least some big red ass lumps.
Knowledgeable Member
I've done both, I'm on trt and I can say my E2 levels where in normal range while doing Sub Q I switch back to IM due to running out of insulin pins..Originally Posted by A2thej2008
Productive Member
For cycles I would go im but for trt sub q all the way
Knowledgeable Member
Agree
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote