I was wondering, I've read every post on "cycle goes wrong for the young" and I arrived to the conclusion that almost all of them were under 20 when they first began with roids.(and often without PCT)
One of them was 23 but his BW didnt show anything more than low test.(can be unrelated with steroids(im 19 and I got low test(about like him and I never touched aas, yet) and another one at almost 21 with a very very bad pct(Like he said when he ajust his PCT, he felt better).
So I'm asking is this reasonable to think that for most people 21-23 is a "safer" range to start. I'm not saying that their is no risk at this age(I would never say that for any age...)
Taking AAS at 16 is a VERY BAD idea 18 it's a BAD idea but at 21-23 does it become only a NOT SO GOOD idea...
Do Someone responsable ready to take the risk and who know what he is doing are diminishing the risk enough, even if he is 21?
i'm asking that because I have low test(trying to raise it naturally ATM) and if it works well I'll train 2-4 more years natty and enjoy the extra test. But if after all my effort my test is still low. being on TRT won't scare me as much as it does now. So, I'll be willing to take that risk.
Even if I'm ready to take it I still don't want it so I'm asking if 21-23 is a "safe enough" range ?
p.s. : If you didnt read all this post don't bother blasting me. And even if you did read it, don't bother blasting me. If you have comment I would like to have them respecfully no matter what it is. And please keep an open mind.
Thanks