Printable View
I've run both and can say I probably won't ever run a long ester cycle again. What do you think the benefits are to it. With a short ester cycle.. It kicks in faster, less time on, and out of your body faster.. So if you wanted you could do more cycles a year.. All pros in my opinion!! What are some thoughts on it?
Pretty much the same you can do short blast cycles with long esters but its upping the dose accordinglyQuote:
Originally Posted by Psaletta
Higher dose may equal more sides for some.
Swings and roundabouts I think
Can you explain this further?Quote:
Originally Posted by panntastic
I would say it depends on your level of involvement in relation to your cycle, if your running multiple compound at high doses , this equals a lot of pinning not to mention a lot of oil carrier being injected ew. On the other hand, if your running a standard cycle, I think short is the way to go.
If you normally run 12 weeks @ 500mg per week using test eQuote:
Originally Posted by Turkish Juicer
I can't see a problem upping that to 1g a week and running it for 8 weeks you would still see amazing results
Not to be a dik but type the same thing in the search function and the same question gets asked once a week!
No hard feelings.. It was more for conversation. I can't see running a test e,c and deca cycle instead of prop and npp or tren e instead of ace. Why spend so much time on when its not needed. I'm sure the more advanced in bb you get you might need to but I'm speaking for general masses.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lunk1
It comes down to timing and goals. If your doing it to look ggod in a mirror and bang chicks...then short ester cyclles are more favorable. If your planning to compete in something then you may run a long cycle which often times yield slower yet mor sustainable gains!Quote:
Originally Posted by Psaletta
Both have advantages and disadvantages! I've done em both and will most likely continue to alternate depending on my goals and timing!
Looking good and banging chicks sounds pretty good to me. Hahaha. But seriously I see what your saying Lunk and appreciate your 2 cents.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lunk1
Shorts were its at, only downside is pinning everyday but its a small price to pay for the beniffits, i only ever and only will ever do short esters.. Jmo
The only benefit I personally see to short esters is the faster in and faster out nature of the compounds. Your blood levels reach peak faster, and clear faster. This is why people often run shorter cycles. The shorter cycle might be helpful in pct. but as far as results, the effects should be identical regardless of ester.
I like the idea of less injections personally, it just fits into my schedule better.
I do too. But I don't have to concern myself with HRT. If I did I would probably lean toward eight week cycles instead of 12 or longer.Quote:
Originally Posted by redz
Id rather the wait of long esters in exchange for pinning only twice a week... Dont think i could handle pinning more often, yet!!