No, it is YOU that does not understand or at least refuses to see any light shed on your hypotheses. This is actually aggravating to me now. You simple are not absorbing the difference between fact and opinion.
I dont think you really understand what it is im trying to explain to you. What you are doing in this thread is attempting to put together several groups of individuals into the same blender, turn it on, and then suggest the blended matter is fact. It isn't, for the final time.
To suggest that a AAS user who shuts down his HPTA a number of times in his lifetime is going to require TRT is a fact, is not telling the entire story. You continue to leave out one VERY important variable. And that is, by the time this user has completed what you're suggesting, he's a prime candidate for TRT! IE, hes in his 40's+! But you want to include men in their 40's, men who are hypogonadal (primary, secondary), and veteran AAS users. None of which are typically young men! This is my point! Young men reading this thread entitled "Fact" which clearly is NOT fact thinking TRT is ok and its equally fine to do AAS. But you're attempting to make it fact.
And to suggest further that you used the word "Fact" to simply
draw attention is the most irresponsible thing ive heard form you so far. Smarten up Metalject. You're a lot more intelligent than that, and you certainly dont need to fabricate lies and be an "azzhole" (your word not mine) to get attention. Use your brain and supportive data to get attention and convince people, not buzz words that promote b.s.
Look, im not about to brow beat you anymore. I think ive made my point clear and there's no need for me to continue.
I hope you're able to see what im attempting to convey here. Perhaps later on you'll have an, "ahhh i see" moment. Until then, im out brother.
Respect.