Results 1 to 22 of 22
-
03-11-2013, 10:07 PM #1
Running Tamoxifen (nolva) on cycle
I wasn't sure where I should post this but I figured posting here would receive the most traffic...
I was reading up on Nolva and came across this from Steroid .com:
"Estrogen is also important for a properly functioning immune system, and not only that, but your lipid profile (both HDL and LDL) should also show marked improvement with administration of tamoxifen (4). Many bodybuilders actually use this stuff during their cycle for the health benefits provided by it."
Do any of you guys use nolva on cycle for improving your lipid panel? Does it make a significant difference?
If so, how safe is it? Obviously, the less compounds we are taking, the better. Would taking Nolva on cycle be worth it?
-
03-11-2013, 10:09 PM #2
Originally Posted by JWP806
-
03-11-2013, 10:12 PM #3
Awesome, have you changed you AI protocol?
-
03-11-2013, 10:14 PM #4
I'd also be interested to know if it hinders gains at all. The same article says it possibly reduces IGF.
-
03-11-2013, 10:16 PM #5
Originally Posted by JWP806
-
03-11-2013, 10:19 PM #6
Originally Posted by JWP806
-
03-11-2013, 10:24 PM #7
Yeah, that's true. I was taking liquidex and prami for my past test/tren cycle and still developed a small lump so I have been running some nolva to curb it until my Ralox gets in, which should be tomorrow. If I am taking ralox, would it be wise to also run nolva (for lipid control) alongside it? I don't believe ralox has the same properties for lipid control as nolva does?
-
03-11-2013, 10:28 PM #8
-
03-11-2013, 10:34 PM #9
Originally Posted by JWP806
-
03-11-2013, 10:35 PM #10
Originally Posted by JWP806
-
03-11-2013, 10:40 PM #11
I just read some of that info earlier today... I have heard ralox is the absolute best compound to treat gyno but you never hear about the terrible possible sides. How safe do you feel ralox is for a 26 year old with no prior heart conditions? Would you recommend it to treat gyno and would it be a good idea to run it with nolva to help combat hyperlipidemia?
Thanks for baring with me with all of my questions. Your answers have been very helpful.
-
03-11-2013, 10:58 PM #12
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Scamming my brothers
- Posts
- 11,286
- Blog Entries
- 2
Keep in mind tamox administration will lower blood levels of arimidex by around 30% SO rather than back it down you may need to bump it up.
-
03-11-2013, 11:00 PM #13
Originally Posted by JWP806
- affects vitamin D and calcium absorption
- larger doses required
- vascular effects
You could run the two for a week but supplement your D and calcium to compensate for effects of raloxifene.
-
03-11-2013, 11:05 PM #14
Banned
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Kitchen, Gym, Kitchen....
- Posts
- 13,716
-
03-11-2013, 11:06 PM #15
-
03-11-2013, 11:09 PM #16
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Scamming my brothers
- Posts
- 11,286
- Blog Entries
- 2
Isnt it true that these are the only side effects it exhibits more than other serms? Also arent there other sides of tamox that are more prevalent with it than ralox that are more dangerous? In fact blood clotting is more prevalent with tamox than ralox, especially in the lungs. Look im all about sides awareness BUT im all about being realistic when it comes to them. If I have gyno - Im taking/have taken Raloxifene..period end of story. Also lets consider the possibility of some gender specific sides here. I think if we compare clinical data for the purpose of gyno treatment in males both ralox and tamox are considered safe and effective. Ralox is just more effective for this purpose.
Doesnt tamox also lower good cholesterol as well as bad IIRC ?
-
03-11-2013, 11:10 PM #17
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Scamming my brothers
- Posts
- 11,286
- Blog Entries
- 2
-
03-12-2013, 12:28 AM #18
Originally Posted by jimmyinkedup
I agree, while it is prudent to raise awareness of possible side effect, we certainly don't want to cry wolf and instill panic by overstating risks. A related problem however is that much of the information disseminated here is given with little regard to an individual's health history. We don't know who sits on the other side of that keyboard (or smart phone) and what may be relevant information in prescribing a treatment (AI, SERM, etc.) may not be readily disclosed to us.
I have yet to see any thromboembolic events in any patient treated with raloxifene - even among terminally ill patients - but it's a risk worth being aware of. The reality is, the probability for a serious adverse rxn such as DVT or an MI is most
likely very low, but the events themselves are significant enough to warrant caution. The most common clinical complaints with raloxifene are edema, insomnia, and cramping but the effect of raloxifene on calcium and vitamin D metabolism is also a concern among physicians - but again, its not like to be as big an issue in an otherwise healthy male/female who is making strides to exercise and eat correctly.
-
03-12-2013, 12:57 AM #19
Guys, the information you provided is outstanding. I appreciate your extremely thorough responses and explanations.
That's why I love this board.
-
03-12-2013, 01:07 AM #20
Originally Posted by JWP806
Glad you posted the thread JWP. It's a great topic for discussion.
-
03-12-2013, 07:14 AM #21
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Scamming my brothers
- Posts
- 11,286
- Blog Entries
- 2
-
03-12-2013, 07:43 AM #22
Productive Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Jorgia
- Posts
- 3,353
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
So far so good, they seem to be doing what they’re supposed to.
Expired dbol (blue hearts)