first, and foremost I want to thank all of you experienced in AAS for taking the time to help educate us new guys. I have been lurking this forum for a few months trying to soak up as much knowledge as I can regarding minimizing negative affects while on cycle. Since I know the question will be asked I am 21 years old with three years training experience (1.5 years of serious lifting). Now the next thing I know that I will hear is I am to young to cycle, and that is fine since as of now all I am looking for is more knowledge. The main reason I have seen most of y'all advise against teens cycling is HPTA is still developing. From what I have read (and I could be horribly wrong) the only way to see if the HPTA levels are in range is from blood test. I have been looking up how to read blood test in regards to what to look for before cycling, but it seems age group have big ranges from 18-30. So in theory if you took a 30 year old male and a 22 year old male and blacked out the precise ages and went based on the range from 18-30, and both had good blood work could they both run a cycle? ultimately is there any way to gauge if ones HPTA is still developing or not?
Next point, I have read the thread " Cycles gone wrong for the young", and to be frank no shit they went wrong. None of the cycles made much of any sense, and resembled a child in a candy store with a 20$ for the first time. It seemed to me (once again no expert) that none of the cases in that thread had any of the following; 1. Reasonable beginner cycle (Test only), 2.Pre-cycle/ post-cycle blood work, 3. No AI's or HCG ran while on, 4. Poorly planned or no PCT at all. What I am trying to get age aside these instances mentioned would crash almost anyone regardless of age. It is a no brainier just because ones source can get everything under the sun ones first cycle should not consist of four different orals and tren. So lets say some one in their early to mid 20's ran an appropriate beginners cycle and actually adhered to the previously stated four points what kind of true sides are they looking at besides the ones everyone faces when deciding to pin?
For argument sake lets take this cycle and say a teen is running it ( straight from the educational thread)
WK 1-8 Test prop = 100mg eod
Wk 1-8 Aromasin Ed monitor and adjust accordingly
WK 1-8 HCG= 250 iu twice week.day before prop, same day as AI
PCT: wk 9-12 Clomid: 75/50/50/50
Nolva: 40/20/20/20
Now that we have a reasonable cycle, with an AI, HCG, and Serms what risks does the teen run that everyone else who decides to cycle doesn't?
Thanks for taking the time to read. I look forward to hearing everyone's responses.
(Sorry for grammar posting from my phone)