Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread: Test vs GHRP-6
-
04-30-2013, 08:11 PM #1
New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Posts
- 14
Test vs GHRP-6
Some countries like New Zealand and Australia are difficult to get Test into it seems.
While items such as peptides GHRP-6 etc are currently fine to import with local authority's.
Is a peptide such as GHRP-6 as effective as using Test??
main aim is to gain muscle mass fast during a cycle.
-
04-30-2013, 08:37 PM #2
Not even in the came category bro..those peps effect your GH and Igf levels, one would normally compare PEPs to GH..test is a different animal. They both produce results but in different manners
-
04-30-2013, 08:38 PM #3
Also ghrp-6 alone is a pointless as can be, you need to add a GHRH
Wat do you mean during a cycle?
-
05-01-2013, 06:04 AM #4
New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Posts
- 14
Am planning to take some stack / products for a set period of time ( cycle) to gain mass that will be retained post cycle.
These products are yet to be determined and will be those which I can easily source and import to my country.
Obvious choice is as mentioned Test for the main product but as it may be difficult to obtain am thinking of other effective alternatives.
I don't mind which manner the mass gain is achieved with.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Repeated swelling from pining in...
07-01-2024, 07:42 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS