I know there have been a few threads on these canvassing the various differences but I would just like clarification on a few points:
- Would it be correct to say that the less time you spend on cycle the higher the chances of recovery and thus the safer the cycle is. i.e it is advantageous to have your natural test production shut down for as little time as possible.
Does this make prop a safer choice given the cycle length is shorter OR would the following be correct;
- Test E cycle = 12 weeks. Test doesn't kick in till week 4 thus shut down time is only 8 weeks.
- Prop cycle = 8 weeks and 8 weeks of shut down time.
Then again you start PCT after prop almost immediately whereas with E you wait 2 weeks so that should mean prop is the safest option?
Other factors;
- prop leads to less bloat which is good if you want lean gains and don't want to hold water weight.
- downside of prop is EOD injections and painful injections which I assume is worth it if prop is indeed safer (would like members input here with regard to the pain of EOD injections and the discomfort as I have no first hand experience - just want to know if it is worth it for a safer cycle).
Also since prop is a shorter cycle and if you run AI and HCG on cycle then you would save money because you would have to use less? is that correct?
I am also thinking about running finasteride on cycle (even though I have all my hair and do not even know if I am even predisposed to MPB simply because I think it is too big of a risk). Now this is quite expensive so a shorter cycle would save money here again (or would you not need to take it till week 4 if on a E cycle because there would be no DHT uptake yet?).
Sorry for the lengthy post and protracted reasoning. If someone with experience could please assess the validity of the above statements ( as this is just what I have gathered from reading the forums) and post any other arguments for/against prop or ethanate that would be very much welcome. Thanks.