Under dosed gear

Hello boy and girls
I have ran two cycles with gear I believe to be less than up to par. I now have 100% legit gear and am interested in trying deca
So my question is this
Should I stick to a basic test only or run test and deca ?
I have run test twice before but who know at what concentration

26 yo
2 test e cycles at 500mg/week
18% bf current will drop before
245lb
6'3

Thanks
Mikey hulk

I would just run test again. See how good the new gear works for you. You may not even need deca.

Did the test do anything the first cycles? Was it bunk or just under dosed?

I did work a little but not much in way of strength or gain
I should note I did a little research on the brand and they appear to have taken a sharp decline on quality and strength at the time of my cycle

If it was just under dosed I would run the test and deca... I did it for my second cycle and it yielded much greater results then the test alone... Just my 2 cents some others might disagree.

Thank you for opinion

Did you determine with BW or just guessing. Too many times ppl blame under dosed gear when it's likely some fault of their own due to nutrition or routine.

Bw at end of second cycle I was just over the high end of the range

I would try your new stuff but thats just me mikey

When EXACTLY did you do BW during the cycle?

Week 10 second cycle

How much were you using and what were your total and free test numbers and ranges?

500mg/week and I can't remember off hand

How long did you wait after cycle to get bloodwork?

Well if you were only at the high end of the normal range I would venture it was not low dosed but completely fake.

Try a cycle with legit test once!

^^^^ I agree with lunk, I said earlier that I would go test, deca next, BUT PLEASE DISREGARD... I was assuming it was slightly under dosed, it sounds now like it was bunk gear... Listen to lunk on this one...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lunk1

Well if you were only at the high end of the normal range I would venture it was not low dosed but completely fake.

Try a cycle with legit test once!

---

^^^ I totally agree. If the gear was gear at all you would be at a range much higher than Normal Natural High Range ! I don't understand why you can't remember like if it was in the teens or the 2000's h/L or 3,000's . But that will give an Idea. Erections, libido, energy, appetite etc... Do as Lunk said ...crazy mike

Crazy mike they use a different system in Canada range is something like 9-27 and pre cycle I was 13 near the end I was 34 or so

I wouldn't say it was 100% bunk I did notice some sides

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mikey hulk

Crazy mike they use a different system in Canada range is something like 9-27 and pre cycle I was 13 near the end I was 34 or so

---

Even if that's the case Mikey, if you have legit quality test it would be best to run a legit cycle with close to real test results.

Roger that

I would stick with the Test cycle.

I have known several people who have tried Test/Deca cycles and while the gains are good, PCT is a bitch. I really think that Deca while an excellent substance for those who are on TRT or have established themselves at being resilient with recovery, for those who only have a cycle or two, I feel the likely difficulty in recovery is not worth the risk.

Just my opinion based on my observations,

Ok thank you sir

start with the Test and see what happens.... you might be good with just that.