Under dosed gear

[mikey hulk]

Hello boy and girls
I have ran two cycles with gear I believe to be less than up to par. I now have 100% legit gear and am interested in trying deca
So my question is this
Should I stick to a basic test only or run test and deca ?
I have run test twice before but who know at what concentration

26 yo
2 test e cycles at 500mg/week
18% bf current will drop before
245lb
6'3

Thanks
Mikey hulk

[Money Talks]

I would just run test again. See how good the new gear works for you. You may not even need deca .

[Chx beach 79]

Did the test do anything the first cycles? Was it bunk or just under dosed?

[mikey hulk]

I did work a little but not much in way of strength or gain
I should note I did a little research on the brand and they appear to have taken a sharp decline on quality and strength at the time of my cycle

[Chx beach 79]

If it was just under dosed I would run the test and deca ... I did it for my second cycle and it yielded much greater results then the test alone... Just my 2 cents some others might disagree.

[mikey hulk]

Thank you for opinion

[Lunk1]

Did you determine with BW or just guessing. Too many times ppl blame under dosed gear when it's likely some fault of their own due to nutrition or routine.

[mikey hulk]

Bw at end of second cycle I was just over the high end of the range

[clarky.]

I would try your new stuff but thats just me mikey

[Lunk1]

When EXACTLY did you do BW during the cycle?

[mikey hulk]

Week 10 second cycle

[Lunk1]

How much were you using and what were your total and free test numbers and ranges?

[mikey hulk]

500mg/week and I can't remember off hand

[Chx beach 79]

How long did you wait after cycle to get bloodwork?

[Lunk1]

Well if you were only at the high end of the normal range I would venture it was not low dosed but completely fake.

Try a cycle with legit test once!

[Chx beach 79]

^^^^ I agree with lunk, I said earlier that I would go test, deca next, BUT PLEASE DISREGARD... I was assuming it was slightly under dosed, it sounds now like it was bunk gear... Listen to lunk on this one...

[crazy mike]

Well if you were only at the high end of the normal range I would venture it was not low dosed but completely fake.

Try a cycle with legit test once!

^^^ I totally agree. If the gear was gear at all you would be at a range much higher than Normal Natural High Range ! I don't understand why you can't remember like if it was in the teens or the 2000's h/L or 3,000's . But that will give an Idea. Erections, libido, energy, appetite etc... Do as Lunk said ...crazy mike

[mikey hulk]

Crazy mike they use a different system in Canada range is something like 9-27 and pre cycle I was 13 near the end I was 34 or so

[mikey hulk]

I wouldn't say it was 100% bunk I did notice some sides

[Lunk1]

Crazy mike they use a different system in Canada range is something like 9-27 and pre cycle I was 13 near the end I was 34 or so

Even if that's the case Mikey, if you have legit quality test it would be best to run a legit cycle with close to real test results.

[mikey hulk]

Roger that

[Far from massive]

I would stick with the Test cycle.

I have known several people who have tried Test/Deca cycles and while the gains are good, PCT is a bitch. I really think that Deca while an excellent substance for those who are on TRT or have established themselves at being resilient with recovery, for those who only have a cycle or two, I feel the likely difficulty in recovery is not worth the risk.

Just my opinion based on my observations,

[mikey hulk]

Ok thank you sir

[Jiggylow]

start with the Test and see what happens.... you might be good with just that.