Why would a trusted site have a cycle lay out like this?

**Athlete127** · 10-15-2013, 07:26 AM

Basically looking at one of the big, well known trusted sources and I was looking at their stacks that are pre designed and it has this as one. Isn't this set up for failure?

Asking because why would they have the user inject test e and Mast /tren ace at the same starting point?

An extended lean bulking cycle for the advanced user. User will inject 1.5cc of Test E and 1.5cc of Bold twice per week for weeks 1-16. User will also inject 1cc of Mast Ace every other day for weeks 1-16 along with 1cc of Tren acetate every other day for weeks 1-8. Starting in week 8 the user will take 4 tabs of Turan everyday 8 weeks and will began taking 500iu of HCG every 3rd day starting in week 6 for 4 weeks.

**austinite** · 10-15-2013, 07:29 AM

What sponsor? We don't have steroid sponsors. The banner is for a steroid alternative sponsor. No injectables.

**Athlete127** · 10-15-2013, 07:31 AM

I never said a sponsor, I just said a well known source that I know alot of people on this board use.

**austinite** · 10-15-2013, 07:33 AM

Originally Posted by Athlete127

I never said a sponsor, I just said a well known source.

Sorry I misread.

Your answer is simple. Sources do not have your best interest. They are salesmen and will do whatever it takes to make a sale. Never take advice from your source.

**Athlete127** · 10-15-2013, 07:36 AM

Aside from the hcg , is the only other wrong thing just the test e?

**marcus300** · 10-15-2013, 07:37 AM

Originally Posted by Athlete127

I never said a sponsor, I just said a well known source that I know alot of people on this board use.

Its not a good sponsor, very bad reputation IMHO.

I would post your planned cycle here along with all you stats and you will get a better idea regarding good solid cycles suited to your needs and experience.

**austinite** · 10-15-2013, 07:38 AM

Who knows. Stacks can't be generalized. Need to know complete stats before any advice is given.

**Athlete127** · 10-15-2013, 07:40 AM

I ask because I basically got this stack for free on some miscommunication and that was their layout to run it which didn't make a lot of sense.

**Capebuffalo** · 10-15-2013, 07:44 AM

Using a measure of volume instead of a mg/ ml dosing would have me not feeling comfortable with them. Too many variations on products form different sources to dose that way.

Stay here and get great advice from experienced people with your health and safety as their priority.

Damn op just realized it's you. Haven't we been over this in another thread with you?

**Athlete127** · 10-15-2013, 07:49 AM

We just talked about the actual cycle. All I really wanted to know was the reason for a supposed trusted source I thought, as to why they had that layout. I got my answer.

**Bert** · 10-15-2013, 09:32 AM

I don't see anything wrong with it.

**AlphaMike** · 10-15-2013, 09:42 AM

Originally Posted by AshopRep

I don't see anything wrong with it.

Of course you would say that

**Buster Brown** · 10-15-2013, 11:48 AM

They want to sell as much product as possible. Cycles are highly individualized and templates/cycle outlines should be taken with a grain of salt.

**barbery** · 10-15-2013, 10:38 PM

Can you name the source plz

**austinite** · 10-15-2013, 10:45 PM

Originally Posted by barbery

Can you name the source plz

Ok, enough. All of your posts are out there. Stop trolling or read the rules and follow...

**barbery** · 10-15-2013, 11:00 PM

I thought you just couldn't ask for the name of a sterois source? Is it against the rules to ask for the source of bad advice
Too?

**austinite** · 10-15-2013, 11:05 PM

No source talk whatsoever, for whatever reason.

**Lunk1** · 10-15-2013, 11:42 PM

I think the issue at hand in the OP is the fact that the site in question is suggesting the 2 short ester compounds (Mast and Tren ) to be started at the same time as a long ester test.

No..my advice would be to start a cpl weeks in advance with the test then add the short esters the last 8-10 weeks