general rule of thumb keep test lower?

[Athlete127]

Say one wants to run 600 mg eq a week

Better to inject 500mg test e a week rather than 750?

[austinite]

Since EQ produced little to no results, it would only make sense to run Test high.

[Athlete127]

Gotcha...

What if you ran mast and tren along with eq? 100mg eod. Then would test need to be at the lower or high end?

[austinite]

This is all a personal preference. There are no rules.

[Athlete127]

How would you run your Test if you were to run test e alongside the others I mentioned?

[austinite]

Depends on my goals, side effect expectations, e2 management, etc... You just need to find what works for you. My experience is not relevant.

Something tells me you're not all too experienced, which is fine, but why are you considering multiple compounds? This is another reason why folks need several Test only cycles under their belts, so that they can make more informed decisions on things like this. I'm not sure how anyone can make the right call, if they don't have experience with varying test doses.

You're in trial and error mode right now, part of the experience you'll accumulate.

[Athlete127]

I feel like I am experienced, just never ran test e.

I've ran test/tren /mast two separate times...

This isn't counting the times before I ran test by itself a couple times and test/tren once.

I went and ahead and made a new thread, you can rant on me. Haha.

[austinite]

Well I don't do Tren so I can't comment on that. I rarely run high doses of Test unless it's test only. I generally allow the other compounds to do the work and that makes it easier to manage side effects. Masteron would be the exception where it would likely be equal parts.

From research though, I think higher test with Tren can combat side effects. But again, Tren doesnt work on me so don't take my word for it.

[Athlete127]

Yeah i gotcha

I ran prop and tren at equal dosages with no sides but E is a little different ball game.